If I owned single family (I don't) I'd consider dogs.If you think someone might be a smoker instead of asking if they smoke ask them how many cigarettes they smoke a day (picked that one up on the forum).Check their social media - if you see photos of a dog or cat that's significant (could be a parents' pet so use your best judgement) or photos of them smoking and you'll have your answer. 

So is the 70% rule a judgement call basically?

Keep it short and non-vindictive (judgemental?). 

@Joel OwensObviously, the OP and other posters missed your point completely.They think there’s a formula to follow and in 3 months of following said formula they’ll have a list of well financed, eager, experienced, quick decision making investors who trust their judgement and will automatically be interested in any deal they present them with.I do have such investors.

· How it Works:o First the Referee will read aloud the Judgement of Foreclosure.

As soon as they miss that first payment, a default judgement happens and the eviction is completed and a done deal.

This would mitigate some risks (loans getting called, etc.) but would introduce new ones (houses leveraged to 60-80% aren't the best targets for lawsuits, the bank/creditor will get paid first before some frivolous lawsuit judgement from what I understand, so paid off houses are a rich target).

Lastly, even if you do win a judgement, do you think you’ll be able to collect?

That greed supersedes or clouds agents judgements which allows them to close these deals for him.

Upon title search my attorney has discovered the following:Previous owners of the house transferred the ownership to their living trust.The bank foreclosure judgement was against the owners and the trust was not listed in the foreclosure.