I will appreciate all leads or recommendations  

@Ben ClingerHi Ben, I just noticed your post.Toledo just clarified their inspection criteria for section 8 houses and decided they wanted their cake and to eat it too...we don't have to have an interior inspection (since LMHA inspects that during their inspection), but we DO have to pay for a Lead Inspector contractor to visually inspect the exterior of the house and of course we DO have to pay the $45 fee (which is of course what this is all about).LMHA of course inspects the outside of houses along with the inside so the whole lead inspection is redundant.

This cuts down on showings and may lead to longer vacancies - which costs an investor money.

Do you think that could lead to a price correction or just a plateau?

I'm a seasoned finance profeesional with over 7 years working in Corp Dev & IR roles in Argentina.

However, if it's truly one of those communities that has very high crime and difficult to attract any descent tenants, it can lead to disaster.

On the surface, it appears to be a straightforward role, but it becomes far more challenging when faced with issues like non-paying tenants requiring eviction or broken systems that haven't been properly followed.As a self-managing property owner, it is absolutely doable—but success depends on treating it like a business.

You still need to address their role in this situation directly or it will happen again as managing repairs is a core part of the PM role.

I'm talking $100 to now $450 per lead in my area.

For instance, if the neighboring unit has a shut-in chain-smoker, or the house has railroad tracks behind it, it is definitely better to let a lead know and lose them than to not disclose, upset them and lose them (after they leave a nasty review).I'd agree with Jonathan that even late complaints need to be taken seriously, and barring some obvious malfeasance, I would just take the word of the resident and fix the issue.