But you’d be losing out on revenue and a lot of pet damage is small/easily fixable if the owner isn’t negligent with their pets.

You knew it was a problem, and it wasn't done maliciously or negligently.

Dogs that don't have shots - at least all initial + rabies - are disqualified, because that suggests an owner who is either negligent or too poor to afford the vet visits.

Unless they came out and made the rebar stick up, or knew it was a possible hazard for months, there's no negligence. 

Since we pro-rate partial months, the difference in money is negligible. 

Other wordings required that it was due to the unit owners negligence. 

“There was no demarcation to show you it’s just a line going through [the villa duplex], even though they have the tools to show that.”Holness said that property appraiser pictures linked to the auction site showed the villa as being the parcel he was bidding on.But the appraiser’s site and information on the county’s tax site also show the negligible value of the property, that there is no building value, that the land takes up only 100 square feet and that the property is one-foot wide.Officials say state law does not allow the refund Holness is seeking.The message from county officials and real estate experts is that auction participants need to do their homework and make sure they’ve checked for all possible problems a property might have.

But if I had to choose one over the other I'd go with a quality property in a market with good fundamentals (jobs and population growth) even if cash flow on purchase was negligible over a building with high cash flow in a flat market.  

So long as you aren't acting with gross negligence you've really got nothing to worry about on the lawsuit front.

If not then maybe you're not near the finish line, sounds like someone just being negligent towards your file.