The risk of flooding itself, which is incredibly disruptive and can make your property uninhabitable to 3-6 months at best. 

The only counterpoint I could come up with is it seems unlikely someone who can afford $7k/mo rent wants to disrupt their home, their life and probably their work over saving $4k per year.

Our reason for NOT pulling one, is there are functioning businesses in the building, and the seller does not want to risk an issue that would cause loss of rent or un-realistic requests from the municipality that may disrupt the commercial tenants. 

My question is it legal for me to deny an applicant in this situation because of the disruption to other tenants, threats to their health and safety and additional costs? 

Your losses on rent and renovation will be less than her continued damage and disruption. 

The other is for the business being forced to move which will result in lost lease home improvement expenses, and lost of business due to the move, lost of efficiency due to the disruption.

You could potentially have some disruption if someone needed to repair the line under your property.

@Mason HickmanAgreed.The COVID-19 caused really rapid increase of M 2 in a short period of time.Short term, the negative effect is obvious on rental late payment, disruption on various business, etc.I just felt like it might a huge positive effect on real estate price, unexpectedly to most people, due to M2 increase.Who knows, just gut feeling.

I also HATE going to a physical office to go to in-person training at my KW office because it disrupts the flow of my day and derails my efficiency. eXp has all the training online, which is ultra-convenient.

Besides the fact that the Brokerage is a industry disrupting agency, Bill is incredible.