data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6480f/6480fea4480a62768ab76d57ac9ae9c9935f7ffb" alt=""
18 December 2017 | 11 replies
Louis is different than Jeff City, Springfield or K.C. all real estate is local, meaning the interpretation of regulatory matters can be different, St.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/443cc/443cc40b6443b0d6c1fe3d824382fd2aef023a89" alt=""
22 January 2014 | 20 replies
You should consult your local Realtor or a local RI Attorney in your area for interpreting your state's version of the above quoted text.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41631/4163199f995a405ec2d195b19b4552dc0b3c66ff" alt=""
4 March 2015 | 10 replies
Does anyone know a good agency for construction worker in SeattleWhen I did part-time interpreting work for the Boeing Company in Seattle, they hired me through Manpower.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24e0b/24e0b64cca253258b5a5bde3904b557f8e36c13a" alt=""
5 March 2015 | 3 replies
As such, "combining" funds in the manner you suggest becomes very difficult and even if done "in the recommended fashion" not without risk.There is an interpretation that an IRA/401k and disqualified party may joint venture in a very rigid fashion.The title is vested jointly on day one, reflecting the percentage of ownership.The equity in the project may not be altered in any way between the JV partners.AND - the tricky part - this is only OK if both sides could do the transaction alone and are not being enabled to participate in a transaction they would not have been able to without access to the disqualified funds.So, if your 401k (could) purchase a property - perhaps with a non-recourse loan - and chooses to JV with you instead, that is OK.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e3e2/2e3e2e5d4027b52c48c3af98bf11d41e2a7a4445" alt=""
11 March 2015 | 2 replies
So (from what I interpret from my reading) is that we do the subject to's just hoping the loan company doesn't hear of the assumption (is this even legal?).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/776f7/776f7055b26902ca3315469924b3da76d4a5ae70" alt=""
1 January 2016 | 27 replies
it's my interpretation that my lender is under the assumption that I will sell or rent at 6 month mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/704e8/704e8cc4f3fb1b10a991601917e95c5370032744" alt=""
11 December 2017 | 9 replies
Every Sheriff's department interprets their duties in an eviction based upon past consequences.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495bb/495bb05037a7b38c6dd05ec2a13232d0a070e2b3" alt=""
6 July 2016 | 5 replies
Second, they are standardized (I know, not always a good thing), but because they're standardized they're (generally) consistent throughout that state/jurisdiction and easily recognized, understood and interpreted if and when you ever have to go to court and enforce/defend it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50bf/f50bf7ba06c0c92919ca9edc055572e6f9d0ccf2" alt=""
23 September 2015 | 36 replies
This is all my interpretation (and advice of multiple mortgage loan officers).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0672/f0672926f1d1d644423705dd6d2d889fc60fe2c7" alt=""
31 October 2016 | 0 replies
Finally, please note that THAT THIS ARTICLE IS NEITHER OFFERING TAX ADVICE NOR SHOULD IT BE INTERPRETED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A CONSULTATION WITH A LICENSED, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT.The limited liability company ("LLC") is the newest entity candidate.