You should consult your local Realtor or a local RI Attorney in your area for interpreting your state's version of the above quoted text.

Does anyone know a good agency for construction worker in SeattleWhen I did part-time interpreting work for the Boeing Company in Seattle, they hired me through Manpower.

As such, "combining" funds in the manner you suggest becomes very difficult and even if done "in the recommended fashion" not without risk.There is an interpretation that an IRA/401k and disqualified party may joint venture in a very rigid fashion.The title is vested jointly on day one, reflecting the percentage of ownership.The equity in the project may not be altered in any way between the JV partners.AND - the tricky part - this is only OK if both sides could do the transaction alone and are not being enabled to participate in a transaction they would not have been able to without access to the disqualified funds.So, if your 401k (could) purchase a property - perhaps with a non-recourse loan - and chooses to JV with you instead, that is OK.  

So (from what I interpret from my reading) is that we do the subject to's just hoping the loan company doesn't hear of the assumption (is this even legal?).  

it's my interpretation that my lender is under the assumption that I will sell or rent at 6 month mark. 

Every Sheriff's department interprets their duties in an eviction based upon past consequences. 

Second, they are standardized (I know, not always a good thing), but because they're standardized they're (generally) consistent throughout that state/jurisdiction and easily recognized, understood and interpreted if and when you ever have to go to court and enforce/defend it.  

This is all my interpretation (and advice of multiple mortgage loan officers).

Finally, please note that THAT THIS ARTICLE IS NEITHER OFFERING TAX ADVICE NOR SHOULD IT BE INTERPRETED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A CONSULTATION WITH A LICENSED, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT.The limited liability company ("LLC") is the newest entity candidate.

Most seem to rely on issuing cease and desist orders.One needs to evaluate the laws of the state they're operating in, the state agency's interpretation of these laws, and the agency's historical enforcement actions as well as the political climate relating to the above.Blanket statements by responders while well intentioned are inaccurate; each state is different and research undertaken on the local level.