I've spoken to numerous Tardus members already that said their "coach" recommended Norada as one of the best investments currently available.

I’ve got numerous other examples.  

I also agree that RE appreciation is unlikely to match the last dozen years, but you never know.Where I am unsure we agree is that paying $450k to improve the cash flow ~$3k (your numbers but I expect my delta wold be similar meaning both my cash flow estimates would be worse than yours but both would be worse by the same amount not affecting the difference) makes sense especially if the cost of having the extra $450k is only 6% rate which is historically simple to beat via numerous investment options and hopefully no one is investing in RE for an expected of 6%.  

Screwed up our taxes numerous times and last month our insurance was dropped since they didn't pay it appropriately.  

Search the BP for ADU appraisals to encounter numerous examples.

My core investing philosophy is pretty simple, and has done very well across almost two decades and numerous cities:1) Invest in cities with population (and job) growth2) Invest in parts of the city where household income is near the median (or slightly below)3) Invest in properties that provide cash flow from day 1 Thank you for sharing that. 

I’ve asked numerous guys I work with if this is a 24 hour job and all laugh.I guess I could be wrong even if you gave someone ten hours labor but 24?

Don't pay for a coach that has numerous warning web articles from cities.

I can find numerous other similar homes for investors.

Thank you for your thoughtful feedback—it’s clear that I need to clarify the distinction between my approach and the traditional perception of “cheap rent.”