data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/640db/640dbee544c00537e63ec00115afea0117795e76" alt=""
15 June 2024 | 87 replies
One case in point was where I served as an expert witness in a foreclosure case in Hillsborough County, FL.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c785/6c785a9d5b182c1db256b10a24624760c7df7e79" alt=""
10 June 2024 | 28 replies
I assume this is probably the case in the other areas as well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd75a/bd75aff910d2d753654ff83be15830e60755e869" alt=""
7 June 2024 | 5 replies
Did you add 10% for property management just in case in the future you don't want to manage it yourself.
6 June 2024 | 0 replies
I may bring an eviction case in the future if the Applicant fails to pay future rent due after the funds of this award have been exhausted or if the award amounts do not cover all amounts due.I understand that These funds are to be used only for expenses that are not paid by other sources of financial assistance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22141/221410a1a0c93a4551af7c78fbd4d62cb1f2c5b6" alt=""
5 June 2024 | 0 replies
HOWEVER, a 2023 appellate case in Florida - S & A Prop.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1445f/1445f62e38f51990530420212cbaeca76a3f98f0" alt=""
4 June 2024 | 13 replies
The city has acknowledged the current STR rules are not legally enforceable and based that on the recent court case in New Orleans where the requirement to have a primary residence in the city was deemed unconstitutional (Atlanta's current legislation has this Primary residence requirement).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2cce/c2ccefedc1a1641834f3542c22b792671d4e5e1d" alt=""
4 June 2024 | 7 replies
It would be great if progressive views/laws on reducing minimum square footage (residential/single family on foundation) were indeed the case in Indiana, and will to catch on (re-evaluating minimum size of homes) elsewhere.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06e0f/06e0f303ab0500c383e6f34c22cb1501baaa4702" alt=""
9 June 2024 | 223 replies
Here is an excerpt (edited slightly by me) from an Appellate Court case in Connecticut that discusses the test:"If an agreement is personal, it cannot be said to have run with the land and thus cannot have bound the future grantee....For purposes of the distinction between real covenants (running with the land, or touching and concerning the land) and personal covenants, a covenant may run with the land or may be a matter between only the purchaser and grantor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b6/f57b649c8e1382962e551143fe279ed3f6e68a87" alt=""
30 May 2024 | 6 replies
Fuel for the day: A bold dark roast coffee from Bulletproof and some protein from Pilgrims Jerky.