Hi @Bob Bowling,What I was getting at here is if you're NOI is $3k/month and that represents 9% cap in a 9% market, then things are about where they should be and your purchase price is about $360k (in this example).

The case can be assigned to the buyer and if the tenant did not move when agreed to, it could be enforced by the new owner.Then again, if the tenant gets wind that the property has sold he may bring a defense to court that the old owner can not maintain the eviction and the case could be thrown out leaving the new owner to start over.I am involved in one right now representing the seller.

The cash flows are represented as static, though, so not particularly accurate.To get more precise, IRR and MIRR.

I did just as you said and, using the docket number, I was able to find the attorney representing the bank.

Buyer Agency Unless Brokerage Relationship with Both.If this box is checked, Broker represents Buyer as Buyer’s Agent and must treat the seller as a customer, unless Broker currently has or enters into an agency or Transaction-Brokerage relationship with the seller, in which case Broker must act as a Transaction-Broker.

The difference between these numbers can represent an opportunity cost.  

If the agent is getting both ends of the commission then shouldn't the agent  be representing both parties?

They may not represent all agents, but deal with enough of them and buyers rightly start to wonder about the value they add.....

Hi @Jeff KennedyI'm a representative with TransUnion SmartMove.

I have an investor I'm representing who is wanting to purchase a property off the market.