From what I have seen Jonna; while Tampa Bay area gets merged together like that all the time, those are three very distinct markets.

Ok so you have a few distinct scenarios there so let's address each.Usually the wholesaler is not closing the deal with their own funds, though that is an option.

I should have mentioned this - thank you for bringing that important distinction up.

I think the distinction is whether you're talking about a personal umbrella policy (which IS liability insurance, but covers pretty much any claim made against you personally no matter where it happens) or just extended liability coverage on the rental property (if anything happens at the property, you're covered).

Grand distinction is the higher end pittsburg brand and is good as well.

If the same person controls multiple entities, then the rules may apply; however, there is no clear distinction in the Act as it does not address this issue.We believe you may own several entities doing up to 3 deals and comply with the exemption.

@Steve Babiak In the First Niagara case, the bank had notice in the Citibank case the bank did not have notice, BIG distinction.

Maybe an error on my part (subtle distinction?)

What if there is no lead-based paint, a distinct possibility on a 1960s building?

Some overlap but each had distinct ones and in different orders to have the most relevant for each first.