I plan to let them keep the cameras but will issue a warning, as well as will have them sign an addendum protecting myself from potential liability related to audio/video recording without visitors' consent, or privacy intrusion liability if the cameras are capturing parts of the neighbors' properties.

Custom forms could easily prohibit assignment without consent.

The seller already signed consent of dual agency months ago when they listed the house. 

https://www.rentspree.com/blog...Landlords and property managers are approved by FCRA regulations to legally review a tenant’s credit report (with consent) for the sole intention of determining an applicant’s qualification to rent.

Therefore, terminating a tenancy by the entirety requires the consent of both parties.

First off he may not be able to convey title without the other owners consent it depends on how the ownership is structured. 

In law, there are aspects of specific and implied warranties, representations, guarantees, agency and consent, passing out written materials can cross lines if you are not familiar with these legal matters, it's somplace investors shouldn't go.

;-)so - we had an eviction scheduled -- the tenant moved out and ran to florida - it took a while - but we finally got them to court and negotiated a consent judgment for 50% with the agreement that they make monthly payments in the amount of $100 starting in November ------ duh --------- no payment ----- so as I understand it - there's no garnishment in florida ------- but I would like a referral for a collections attorney, please, if anyone can help me ---  thanks so much!!!

Bad idea for an investor to approach an owner of a listed property without consent trying to strike some deal.

A financed option can not be assigned without consent, the assignment is not the same as assigning an option that has underlying financing or a sale contract that is not financed or a Sub-to.