There are some options at lower deductibles but trust me you will pay for it!

If things go wrong on a $500K flip vs $1.5 million flip it is much easier to correct and you risk of losing money or not making the profit you want is quite a bit lower.

First time that I am actually glad that I have to go commercial - rates are actually lower.

They are buying NNN single tenant or NNN multitenant retail properties in TX, OK, SC, NC, GA, FL, AL, TN - the states to which the population is migrating and that have business/real estate friendly governments and lower taxes. 

If you agree that the electricity cannot be turned off, what is it that you think that the PM could have done to lower the cost?

A few weeks ago I wrote a summary overview to our investors in both funds to prepare them for probably lower returns in the short run from potential higher defaults.

:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.

Lower the price3.

The rate will also be lower than either of the two previously mentioned options. 

Would you reach out to unmatched leads if their budget is slightly lower, or do you think it's not worth the time?