data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d74b/8d74b086b429af74447c6b767603ad1e1310a0eb" alt=""
12 May 2016 | 4 replies
That makes the list looks pretty bad if off the first 7 lads only 2 are accurate.Also, my list is pulling LOTS of corporate owned properties even though I excluded them in my search.Is there a logical explanation for this?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33376/333763d1efe46c2d6c7e130b96bab954c36c397f" alt=""
23 May 2016 | 27 replies
Thanks again @Jonisha S. for the explanation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9a56/b9a5612fe4f49cd752e91a5966374c76cd7f8de9" alt=""
12 July 2016 | 16 replies
Canor Hesch, I am so thankful for your wonderful step by step explanations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10a8f/10a8f27fb74ab6982286c93aeb03ac1d2bf6e9ae" alt=""
15 May 2016 | 7 replies
So please, if my explanations are poor, call me out on it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cc9e/8cc9efb92744a14af0aef18772c011e0e6c52199" alt=""
16 May 2016 | 12 replies
Okay, further explanation is needed on the topic of exterior color.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99643/99643217fa9c0e3b1e27d7f938b6284932dead89" alt=""
31 January 2019 | 20 replies
I wrote a detailed explanation of this process in the DIY forums.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2e62/b2e62c88f67e92e07662783a615d72b3f5eb1e0f" alt=""
23 May 2016 | 30 replies
Collecting paystubs and W2s seem pretty reasonable but then there are other requests that leave you scratching your head.My recent favorite is "we need a witten explanation how you have bought so many houses with it signed and dated at the botrom"Share your most rediculous underwriter requests.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49ea6/49ea6a705edeb1b3b221b7ea2fc121a393ada54d" alt=""
23 May 2016 | 13 replies
Regarding occupancy, I'm feeling a little slow this morning...can you please expound on your explanation?