data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6904/f6904d416a4ec756ff0e1f3e37867731271964db" alt=""
25 August 2015 | 10 replies
@Cameron Adams, Thanks for the reply.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/110c1/110c1be0a7cfc70dfa474e46ba8dacadef390c2a" alt=""
2 August 2015 | 9 replies
@Cameron Rahewelcome to BP, I was into contracting, but now do mostly flips and seem to do better.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4bdb/f4bdbe70b559e4a2759b49222410acf665af2019" alt=""
20 August 2015 | 0 replies
An anonymous whistleblower is alleging that Zillow steals listing data from agent websites in order to compare it to data scraped from realtor.com and see where its own site is falling short.In a letter to attorneys for realtor.com operator Move Inc., a presumed Zillow employee claims knowledge of illegal actions at Zillow and points Move to specific people, documents, keywords and locations to search for evidence of those actions.The allegations support Move’s claims of misappropriation of trade secrets in a lawsuit filed a year ago against Zillow and one of its execs, Errol Samuelson, a former Move employee.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/981b4/981b4d0699fb533bbac270a3bd475c171ca93319" alt=""
10 September 2015 | 5 replies
@Cameron Skinner, @Curt Smith,I have a different perspective.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff95f/ff95fdee8f8f63d43d95ea26cbf3fe650fda164a" alt=""
18 September 2015 | 3 replies
Thanks, Cameron, a voice of reason in a sea of confusion.I did meet with an attorney to get a legal opinion and though he too has reservations of how the board went about doing things the Declaration trumps all and gives free reign to do as they please so long as they don't (technically) break the law.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56106/56106c413fe952d3e8bd91c2252c742dc1337f43" alt=""
16 September 2015 | 5 replies
Cameron
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c896/0c8965e27946d817d9b4c0ace7f9848fced8254a" alt=""
10 September 2015 | 4 replies
@Cameron Skinner Good point.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ac02/1ac02d16260184395e0d68dee73315c8dd21da53" alt=""
14 September 2015 | 13 replies
@Cameron Skinner,Yes that can charge for it if it is their typical practice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b2f1/6b2f14bd59a336eaea02481bf7219aab893ee05c" alt=""
11 September 2015 | 5 replies
Originally posted by @Cameron Skinner:no it means if you buy a home that is your primary residence for 100k and sell in a year for 200k you will owe tax on 50k 50% of you 100k profit because you lived in it half the time needed for a full exclusion, if you live in it 18 months you would owe tax on 25k of the profit The maximum exclusion is for really high priced homes for example If you buy a home that is your primary residence for 1,000,000 and sell for 1,750,000 in 2 years you woul owe tax on 250,000. 750,000 profit on sale less up to 500k exclusion for married filing joint Incorrect. that is only for certain limited circumstances such as job transfer, loss of job, etc.