It is 100% waterproof because there are no joints and it installs fast, so is less expensive.No matter what you install, the wrong tenant can destroy it.

It reminds me so much of the Eastern Block under the Soviet Union where you couldn't control your own private property and everyone operated in fear, knowing their neighbors could report the slightest violation and destroy their life.

That would destroy my house and it's something I could've asked to be fixed for free before the purchase. 

I appreciate your passion, but don't destroy your future on a dream.BTW, by posting this to a public forum, you may have already limited your options for syndication. 

@Peggy Lindsay, Yes, we just had tenants move out whose home was destroyed by the tornadoes in DFW exactly one year ago. 

So I would keep that in mind as you develop some kind of incentive program. 100% occupancy sounds spectacular but not if all the tenants are bums who are destroying your property.

This gives me more ROI via destroying the interest curve, gives more clout with funding partners for future funding or if I ever would have to discuss any whatever.... 

If he does not make it good then at that point you have to figure out if you are going to simply use the 150 thousand loss as a hard lesson learned or whether you will permanently Destroy all future possibilities of Goodwill between you and your brother in law.

If that 12 feet goes through your living space, you are going to destroy all the flooring, cut the concrete and end up with a huge mess to clean up.

The PM cost can be much less than placing a terrible tenant that doesn't pay rent and destroys your investment.