![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2226978/small_1632149287-avatar-laurena70.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
8 October 2021 | 4 replies
Believe That is the same as -654Seems like the spread sheet has formulas linking to other cells to automatically do math.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1757638/small_1621515294-avatar-victorc160.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 October 2021 | 3 replies
I got rid of it a couple years ago when I realized my cell phone was taking pictures of the same caliber without lugging a 10-pound bag of photo gear around.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1570870/small_1633383154-avatar-aaronk133.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 October 2021 | 28 replies
If they send a "home run" deal out to a hundred investors or so then more than likely the emotional bidding will strip out all the fat off the bone with the only folks making money are the lender and contractors.
7 October 2021 | 9 replies
Objective is to meet his contacts, get inside, have one of them provide the introduction and you will learn about his operations (they know his cell phone # and routine but he's not been open to cold calling so you need warm fuzzy) .
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1460151/small_1633811391-avatar-lesleyw11.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
16 October 2021 | 22 replies
We have the holding company that manages a Texas series LLC, one house per cell.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1814624/small_1694706536-avatar-josephl355.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 October 2021 | 15 replies
Can call direct on the cell phone and respond promptly.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1896657/small_1621516508-avatar-jonimaurer.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 September 2020 | 3 replies
You can archive them on your cell phone to keep the logs if that helps.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/719057/small_1621496030-avatar-robertc226.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 September 2020 | 3 replies
If so, feel free to text my cell (in my sig).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1817414/small_1621515827-avatar-dianam93.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 September 2020 | 46 replies
Keep looking, but only swing at a fat pitch.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/598270/small_1694606335-avatar-christophers95.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 November 2020 | 68 replies
@Jon Schwartz1) To begin with 3 million FMV in California captures innumerable small business owners standing entirely on its own, but if that weren't bad enough, the valuation standard is actually aggregated across all properties owned so it's not in fact in excess of 3 million per property making it much worse still.2) Commercial properties have a very suspiciously expansive scope in the initiative (the devil is in the details, as is typical, and here as well) thus capturing both mom and pop businesses and in many cases even agriculture.3) Unsurprisingly those proffering the provision have acknowledged it is but a first step, once they get their foot in the door with passage of the initiative they will shoot for full repeal of Prop 13 targeting all real estate owners.4) But you make a really great point, sell it as tax on fat cats (while in reality it's scope will hit many many small businesses) makes it palatable to a largely uninformed electorate and further softens them up for delivery of the really big hammer when they shoot for full repeal of Prop 13.