I’m aware of some (California-based) investor-friendly DSCR lenders who will only consider the NOI of the target property, and won’t consider your personal income or assets in underwriting.House hacking is an interesting (and tried-and-true!)

These prices may not have accurately reflected the property's true market value, leading to a slower sales process and ultimately necessitating a price adjustment.Why the Shift in Terminology?

@Sean Walton, not necessarily true.

(so 751 is too good to be true !)

@Michael Smythe they definitely made it seem like it was the best way to go lol but I’ve been down the rabbit hole too many times to now know when it seems too good to be true, that’s why I wanted to come on here and get some insight.

Its more of a value added job than it is true investing.  

So knowing scope would help narrow down on risk mitigation tactics.I guess at the end of the day, it all comes down to knowing what is needed, order of operations, and having as close to true quotes from reputable contractors in hand.Beyond that, really knowing all that is needed and having those extremely detailed scope of works for each trade before you get your bids.  

I agree with your buying advice and those principles are still true today. 

I'm not sure what that is, but if what you're doing with the lender is not completely true, then you may be committing mortgage fraud which is punishable with jail and big fines. 

It’s true that the IRA will incur UDFI/UBIT on the income derived from the same % leveraged.