@Yolanda Eiland Property owners that filled for eviction are in point of time that they're eating **** with their property for a few months now. some of them wants to sell.UP! 

I believe Expense because i was repairing the unit with the exact same thing it had when it broke.I am using Quicken to keep up with all the records and am trying to track these as tax items. 1) how do i track these "Schedule E/C" 2) when i have to drive, eat, and other stuff how is that tracked?

I think it looks okay I would definitely ask for the seller to eat the closing costs at least. 

Do you eat that cost or is it added to their rent payment?

The setup and maintenance costs will be prohibitive and eat up any potential differential in returns that you may be able to generate in real estate as opposed to other IRA investments.

As for the tenants, not having AC doesn't mean you have to eat out.

If it were me I would hold more value on your forplex then the renovation and get a house that fits your needs that may need updating over time which will get you a little sweat equity but not eat up all your time.

If your sale has closed then exchange proceeds can be use to purchase the new property in the entity set up by the QI called the EAT (exchange accommodating title holder). 

I was willing to "eat" all the other nickle and dime things on the property(old furnace, leaky windows, etc), but had I waved the inspection, I would of been screwed. 

At first, it would be for smaller commercial properties, but if the relationship grows well and we make a good team, I'd love to scale up with them.Ideally it's a win-win for all:For the PM:They get a large chunk of equityThey get more business.They get access to my investors' capital for potentially future dealsIn a way, they eat what they killFor me:I look favorable to the lender with an experienced PM team as a partnerI'll get a deal under my beltI'll be able to get help with the downpayment, reducing the burden on my investors and myselfFor my investorsSure, they lose out on some equity, but they'll get a (slightly) higher return due to the lower monthly management feeThey'll sleep easy knowing that the PM has skin in the game and is experiencedTo be clear, I'm playing the long game, so I'm more than willing to do say, a 55/30/15 split with the PM/Investors/Myself and with a 3-5% monthly management fee.