It is just as easy to buy a bad deal as a bad syndication.

While I know that return goals are different for each investor and their specific goals, it seems that a bad or low-performing deal for one person might be what another investor is looking for. 

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

The solution is to work it out, with the developer paying you more than the redemption price tag, but less than the legal fees it would incur to fight about it. 

I felt so bad that I told him that I would reduce my fee from $7,000 down to $3,000.

One person said they Started to call them Facebook and Google BAds not ads… if they see a fb or google ad they run.  

I think supplying the market with decent places to live at affordable prices is never a bad strategy.  

Number wise it does not look bad but this is with such limited information I would not go off of an opinion based on info provided. 

We can debate if that's a bad thing or a good thing, but it just is a thing now. 

After finding outlets and switches placed in bad spots and plumbers who wanted to argue about the use of Pex manifolds my subsequent projects I literally would pound all the electrical boxes and label what they were for and buy all the the materials myself.