Some have juiced that up too with all kind of party rental items. 

Here's a fundamental explanation to get your juices flowing:Assume a house costs $200,000 and rents for $1,500.

Rehabs are going to allow you to create equity but sometimes you have to ask is the juice worth the squeeze.

Hi Jaden,I'm not a fan of hybrid turnkey models like the companies you mention.Also, not a fan of many turnkey marketing companies.Granted, I'm bias but if anyone is interested in turnkey just go straight to the provider.Not many around these days anymore and the one's that are, have stood the test of time and are obviously solid.I think it's less riskier nowadays to invest in turnkey properties than before because all of the poor providers have disappeared and only the good one's are still around.Plus, seems like the "hands off" and so beloved syndications are going belly up so turnkey might be in fashion again.And no big deal IMO that turnkey is not completely "hands off".Is anything completely passive other than 30yr Treasury Bonds?

(See my profile to reach me.)That said, unless these Fi-Fas are substantial, the juice may not be worth the squeeze. 

Make sure it covers the same things when she is in residence.I guess the bottom line is to see if the juice is worth the squeeze here.

The main "con" I've seen with trenchless sewer replacement options is that epoxy lining or pipe bursting methods will not solve a main sewer that has a 'belly' between the house and the city.

I no longer accept Section 8 because the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

Here's a fundamental explanation to get your juices flowing:Assume a house costs $200,000 and rents for $1,500.

i'll just add to what others have said - it's negotiable. but I would consider if the juice is worth the squeeze. i just had this conversation with a client looking to borrow $100k.