If you invest in Minneapolis for whatever reason, expected higher returns, estimated appreciation, etc. you do so with "eyes wide open" to the political and regulatory reality of Minneapolis.  

Bigger is even better when you can avoid legal/regulatory concerns...

If in Canada, be advised that the regulatory and legal process here differs from the U.S.A. and some of what gets covered in Denver, will not carry over.If in the U.S.A., check on regulations w/r to foreign (Canadian) participation in syndications.  

There may be some agreement or policy the servicer has with their investors like, if an asset reaches a certain level of delinquency, they sell it, or something to that effect but those are always business decisions, not regulatory decisions.When a loan enters foreclosure, servicer (Might be lender, might be bank, might not) MIGHT pass that risk/cost to new servicer.

With more regulation coming on all the time (rent control) - dealing with Fair Housing laws, service animals, insurance, and regulatory agencies - finding a quality Property Management company is worth the effort.  

I have been informed I am unable to contact you via by phone or email or to conduct business due to your living and working in a foreign country to ensure regulatory compliance.

Our firm gets weekly updates on changes throughout the world regarding business immigration and we assume that this will have a major impact upon EB-5 candidates.The bulletin says the following:"A final regulation expected to make changes to the EB-5 immigrant investor program is now under review at the Office of Management and Budget, the last step in the regulatory process before the rule is published and implemented.The Department of Homeland Security seeking to increase EB-5 investment thresholds and limit the types of development projects that qualify for the program.

Also see this guys info:https://www.richardhornsby.com/crimes/regulatory/unlicensed-practice-of-real-estate.html

And your approach here is novel, I think folks that think like you should head a regulatory group that keeps slumlords at bay...I'm sure you'll get some additions responses, but some of these items should be weighed as routine maintenance vs. useful life.

Most STOs or those that are contemplating becoming STOs are just using the tried and true route of doing an offering that they are at least saying should be within the regulatory framework (to see if it is or not you need to read the docs no STO has done what they are supposed to just by calling themselves an STO).Now here is the issue.