I'm sure they are correct, but over the past 3 years my RE has outperformed my 401 considerably.

My point was to take it to an extreme, and show how a non cash flow home with decent appreciation rate, can still outperform a home bought specifically for it's cash flow.

But I know there are some uses where it makes a strong case to outperform traditional developing and when the industry works out some of the initial kinks in design, manufacturing, and transporting I think there is tremendous upside and possibilities. 

If the study Michael mentions is accurate, it’s hard to think that the money spent on solar would outperform what you could do with it investing it.

The homes we currently manage are outperforming previous years but so is every one in our community of "airbnb hosts SoFL."

I am 100% sure that a plumber making 80k a year can outperform a dentist who makes 250K in wealth and is not difficult to start from a young dishwasher and become a multimillionaire in his lifetime.

Without hesitation, all three said portfolios in B+ neighborhoods outperform everything else by a wide margin.

I'd say it depends on where you would put that money and if it could outperform forecasted appreciation and cash flow.

The arguments being made are essentially "why can't my listing out perform the comps" (for an obvious damn reason) or comps that are not truly comps holding values down.

Cushman and Wakefield's report of the decade and forecasting 2030 has Austin outperforming all US cities by a landslide.