Their model is more geared for the homeless population as a charity compared to what it sounds like your model would be, but I imagine there would be some crossover with what you're talking about at least on the regulation side. https://www.westword.com/news/advocates-announce-d...https://denverite.com/2017/03/10/denvers-first-tin...https://www.westword.com/news/denvers-beloved-comm...I spent most of my 20's living in vehicles being a climbing bum (from as small as a Suburu wagon to as big as an old school bus, and even managed to keep attractive girlfriends around most of the time, so don't listen to these negative Nancys on here, chicks actually really dig this stuff).

If they're the type of people to spend $150k on charity dinner followed by a Lion King performance, sure take the money and might as well ask for a little more for a duplex in order to make it a viable investment.

Bring it on, I am much more worried about a 200 unit apartment building coming in down the street than only being able to raise rents 7% + CPI per year.This is something I sent to a local charity we have supported (oregon food bank) which decided to come out in support of the bill.My last point is this, rent controls and tenant protections lead to decreased supply and strengthen both the pricing power, average rents and value of the owner's of existing properties.

(besides charity)I care about my tenants and them having a roof over their heads.

If not they are either a non profit or a charity organisation.

It was previously owned by a charity that placed the tenants there.

Being a landlord is a business it’s not a charity you’re not the Red Cross

Definitely pass the bill on to them and explain that you’re running a business, not a pet charity.

They are full service even helping off load excess furniture to local charities and such.

You do not run a charity, and if he needs help paying rent(which should not be for much longer, shut down will end eventually), let him figure that out.