The real danger I perceive is that newer investors find a deal and love to rationalize their purchase by trading to shade the grading.

The field agent in an audit may perceive that the tax payer has changed because title has changed and so the issue of holding and intent come into play.  

The servicer may perceive the transaction as non arms length and black list the buyer from purchasing.

in treatment or location of bites from breed perceived as dangerous vs those legislators have identified as dangerous?

I don’t disagree with the (very emphatic) live at home sentiment at all- and don’t misunderstand my comment to say you need to purchase a home for some perceived status. what I should have clarified is that there is no substitute for experience!

For me it’s more about reliability than how I am perceived by others. 

I trimmed 2 huge trees a  little bit with my maintenance guy for an hour for insurance and think I raised the perceived value $10k. 

I used to get angry about what I perceived as lies, but then I realized that the broker is making a proforma because the current owner doesn't have one to give to the broker.

So the perceived security in this investment is probably giving her the warm and fuzzy's

I am not an realtor, don't know if they have some killing weapon to come up with the value of a land in my situation.Or it's more of the perceived value of the neighbour.