Fortunately we had the financial position to be able to "leave them at the alter" and go a different direction, however most consumers may not be as fortunate or prepared.Tara, One million percent agree with Pat here, make sure that you and the lender are on the same page on, not only which score they take, but also what percentage of the entity they require to take the 'higher' of the scores.For instance, some groups would take the score of the highest percentage owner, but would still check at >20% ownership.

It is not bad, you just have to filter out the stupid stuff like "retail is dead" and "any other syndication is stealing your money" He says he has a large percentage invested in every deal but if I am reading the PPM right then he has exactly 0% invested once it is fully funded.

YOU CANNOT TAKE A PERCENTAGE FEE of a sale of a property if you are not a broker/agent. 

So, yes, your cash flow dollar amount looks big, but from a percentage standpoint, it is terrible.  

I believe the different parties can start at difference percentages of ownership, but to change those percentages, you'd need to create superseding deeds... which is doable... but this is where you need to speak to a TIC-experienced lawyer about what's possible and what the costs will be.Forming an LLC would make adjusting ownership percentages easier, but I doubt you'd be able to get a loan.

They can adjust the JADU when comparing to an ADU as well but will factor at a percentage for a detached unit versus an attached unit. 

It seems to me that if you were not going to run it, you would have to pay someone a wage instead of a percentage of rent.

The concern I have is that I like the fact that every individual investment represents only a very small percentage of my portfolio.

But different subject matter.On a percentage basis:  Just a one year historical view.  

But with the financed deal the renter pays the mortgage down allowing you to tap a percentage of the equity as a tax free loan.