I'm having a hard time seeing how the rents for a 1 bedroom tiny home are going to justify what your renderings are showing.

It also renders a useful service to other prospective landlords down the track as the action will show up on a background check, though I dare say that thinking of others isn't really in your bailiwick.

It's probably worth more as buildable lots... because a Golf Course is Business Income, and my guess is it's income is low to negative long term.You paid a premium to live in a (financially) exclusive "Golf Community" and now the core of it will be medium density and no more Golf Course.Those who paid the biggest premium most likley were those with homes right on the green--now they will be on the front lines (so to speak) with medium density (which might include Section-8 and other Governmental Assistance apartment buildings).Melinials (as a rule) do not value playing golf very much, and with the business income of the course being low--highest and best use...It's also probably going to effect your property values...Location, Location, Location.In short doing this seems to really shaft the Existing Homeowners, too bad your city government doesn't rezone it as a huge duck pond, dig it out and flood it.Even with the course closed there are carrying fees, such as taxes and insurance, so leaving it as a self owned green belt would be a shark bite for the owner.It's interesting that they don't want to zone the same as the existing doughnut of homes and want to go with Lower (to no) income group of people in the middle of the doughnut.From a return on investment it makes sense, but so might a stench producing rendering plant.If they zone to the existing doughnut of home the price loss on homeowners MIGHT be less.This seems to be the trend of the future...

I do think tho that 5G and other wireless technologies are rendering this discussion obsolete.

Thus, the owner owes an affirmative duty to inspect the premises and is required to discover and eliminate dangerous conditions, to maintain the premises in safe condition, and to avoid creating conditions that would render the premises unsafe.Owners of a premises are generally not liable for injuries caused by a defect if they have no actual or constructive notice and no reasonable opportunity to discover the defect . . .

Picture of the house is attached for reference; the first picture is what is currently is and the second is a rough rendering of what Sherwin Williams suggested I do.Thanks!

The issue here is really just the involvement of the brokerage and the broker's buyer agency contract, as well as fair compensation for services rendered.

Since you are basically gap-funding this deal, you aren't secured with ANY sort of equity buffer protection at all, rendering a 2nd lien position sort of useless in this instance since there isn't any protection.

Upon onset, it rendered me unable to continue the work I loved while simultaneously sparking an old interest in real estate.

He referred me to the following text on the POL: "Nothing has been done by or with the privity or consent of the insured or this affiant, to violate the conditions of the policy, or render it void."