![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/33644/small_1621366624-avatar-brandonatbp.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
1 August 2014 | 18 replies
I agree that such provisions can cause more harm and problems than good and in the long run, could cost the landlord more money rather than less.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/169254/small_1621421054-avatar-andylballester.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 February 2014 | 25 replies
It will do more harm than good.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/106526/small_1621417314-avatar-seussiii.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 December 2013 | 13 replies
No one harmed but the bugs themselves and extremely cheap.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/172811/small_1621421457-avatar-bjonesowi.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 January 2014 | 18 replies
Any time something fails a Full Disclosure Test, it is not a good idea and can lead to harm.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/164096/small_1621420563-avatar-mootch.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 January 2014 | 18 replies
Haven't heard anything back yet but either way, no harm no foul.PS - thanks Bill, very informative
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/173575/small_1696378548-avatar-jweimusic.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 February 2015 | 38 replies
Well, with respect, I don't think there is much substance to that metaphor.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/44933/small_1621408085-avatar-djax.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
31 January 2020 | 101 replies
No harm, just pointing out that you really can't/shouldn't go there in RE aspects. :)
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/95532/small_1621416799-avatar-phillyinvestor.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 July 2014 | 10 replies
Making tenants pay for repairs is a great way for problems to go unreported or to create tenant DIY fixes that cause more harm than good and cost more in the long run than fixing it property the first time.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/171203/small_1691284754-avatar-scarno.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 June 2014 | 1 reply
I understand the basic principles of subject-to, lease options and seller financing and I was curious if there's harm in asking the owner (based on their selling situation) if they'll consider a subject-to, lease option etc.?