From http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/trumps-defense-of-his-university/ Trump and his “university,” which was never officially licensed as such and eventually had to change its name to The Trump Entrepreneur Initiative in May 2010, are the subjects of three ongoing lawsuits alleging fraud...My disclaimer: I've never been  to either Trump University or Ben's Cash Flow Freedom University.

If you are going to perform the property management personally (like I do), the LLC might not shield you from personal liability for issues you directly contributed to.For example, a tenant might sue the LLC as the owner, but also you personally because you were the person who was allegedly negligent in failing to fix something (i.e. slippery sidewalk, loose stair rail, etc.). 

And “liabilities” includes any and all unknown liabilities that might be alleged in the future.This is why the really savvy investors leave that LLC in place, inactive, for a sufficient period of time for all time periods for lawsuits to expire, called “statutes of limitation.”

The "Flex Option" goes further than most option agreements, in that it specifically negotiates the right to resell and places the optionee on affirmative notice of the optioning buyer's intent do do so.These explicit disclosures are a strong affirmative defense to allegations of fraud or misdealing, as they are a concrete part of the written agreement.By using this form, wholesale investors have the ability to acquire substantial numbers of marketable properties with limited investment and carrying costs.

(APGI), who allegedly arranged these, was charged here: http://www.justice.gov/tax/WReed_Complaint.pdfThis is the gist of the case, cited from the complaint:A.

The letter listed two main reasons for the brokerage’s decision: NAR policies requiring a fee for the buyer's agent and "a pattern of alleged sexual harassment".  

If you evaluate your risk and find that by using Cozy you increase your risk... then it is a simple and unemotional decision- don't use Cozy.But when you badmouth the company in multiple threads and drop your most egregious allegations (how they conducted/resolved the issue) after I, me, had to alert the company with an @, then I have little time for it.

This also eliminates any "he said" or "she said" allegations that some tenants may try to make in an effort to get an upgrade on a kitchen or bathroom fixture when the property was rented to them for a price that doesn't support the cost of an upgrade on some of these fixtures.

The made allegations and ran press releases saying my company was running a Ponzi Scheme.

It is true that I have good reason to believe that the owner's have abandoned their property, but my belief does not establish the alleged abandonment of their real estate as a matter of law.