Hello,I didn't want to spam and ask for a recommendation in a post, but I scrolled in this forum, and I could not easily find an answer.

To me it would only make sense to keep your current property if you believe there will be more price appreciation on this property than another one you could buy with more cash flow, but that's a gamble.

Can’t you message me first in there bigger pockets not letting me message you first, it say i’am spamming for some reason

.- Cap gain rates increase is only for incomes over $1M- 1031 repeal is only for gains over $500kNo details on either of those thresholds are yet available, so we all have way more questions than answers.Preparing for something that may or may not happen and has no defined form is a gamble.

They are known for quickly evaluating deals that hit the MLS and then spamming the listing agents with low-ball offers on behalf of their clients.

I had the capital and I did enough research and I didn't feel like I was gambling.

I had the capital and I did enough research and I didn't feel like I was gambling.

I feel like this was a big gamble for the OP because if other STR landlords are irresponsible, the association could stop STRs- but he should be fine if he has to transition to long term and rent a room at the hotel when he’s in town. 

It also would be a weird letter to send to a lot of the duplexes here in town, because most of them are in subdivisions full of identical properties.At this point I think it's basically gambling unless you're committed to mailing the same addresses 8-10 times minimum over the course of several months.

However, in this crazy Dallas market I think it is more of a gamble; since nothing cash flows, I would be banking on the property appreciating vs bringing in passive income.