@Gregory Schwartz I have a unique case here so let me explain.

Each Scope of Work (SOW) is unique to each property, as the specific needs of each flip vary widely based on the property’s condition, location, and target buyer.

The most likely outcome here....just speaking from experience.

Flipping during a bear market or high-inflation period can present some unique challenges, but it’s still possible to profit if you approach it carefully.

What was the outcome?

But consultants are paid regardless of outcome.  

While this isn’t ideal from a transparency perspective, it’s a foreseeable outcome when the regulation doesn’t directly impact flipping economics.The Bottom Line: While AB 968 may promote transparency in theory, its real impact will likely create more complexity and hurdles for sellers of distressed properties and newer market participants rather than significantly altering the business strategies of established flippers.

What was the outcome?

What was the outcome?

As brokerages compete to recruit agents, "transaction fee's" become the outcome.