Kind of what I thought, a move to hamstring the CFPB hated by one party, not about transparency it's about political appoints by the President confirmed by the Senate.From a regulatory standpoint this is a bad idea, it destabilizes regulatory consistency according to the political powers at the time who may be in the majority.

We see lots of our clients selling and then 1031 Exchanging into geographic areas that make sure more sense (cash flow, lower property taxes, less regulatory/legislative threats, etc. 

I tend to want to keep my tenants and not increase their rents.There are much larger regulatory issues in my market that tend to just fly under the radar: An eviction process that takes up to a year.

I would call your States business and regulatory affairs office to see what your options are.

Most of what I find in commercial real estate is that the protection is all centered around residential real estate and the general consensus from the regulatory side seems to be "all you commercial folks are grown ups, so you can look out for yourselves."  

Publically traded also means they have higher regulatory standards for reporting and much more transparency than 99% of the private syndicators out there.

When the market collapsed last time my favorite community banks weren't 'lending until the dust settles and there is less regulatory uncertainty.

Short term rentals are in such a precarious place from a regulatory standpoint.

The 1031 Exchange industry has no regulatory body (although we have tried to become regulated many times). 

“With Lending DocAI, you will reduce mortgage processing time and costs, streamline data capture, and support regulatory and compliance requirements.”Could be interesting to see if they can speed up the lending process.