I know the high level but not enough to know where the regulatory pitfalls are.

Each bank has different cut offs besides the regulatory requirements for any large cash transaction report so don't even be concerned as it will match up from one depository to another.I'd keep him as a lender instead of getting involved in profit sharing and interest earnings, but what ever you need to do to make him happy.If you do share profits that opens the door to being responsible for the operations and profits and more partnesrhips fail as one partner sees themselves doing most of the work and having to pay for very little contribution by the other.

An IRA custodian would most likely go out of business for regulatory issues, not lack of capital/profits.

At the same time Dodd-Frank created the new super agency, the CFPB, it also jerked all lenders into a whirlpool of new rules and regulations so confusing that many regulatory agencies are having trouble keeping up.

. […]Finally, we examine whether some factor such as the existence of another regulatory scheme significantly reduces the risk of the instrument, thereby rendering application of the Securities Acts unnecessary.

Here is some advice:If you are going to hire an attorney or a consultant to help you through the maze, make sure they are actually experts on federal regulatory law.

So, as to attorneys attempting to find loopholes or these open doors, their approach may not recognize the powers of federal agencies thinking they may be facing a circuit court or federal court prosecutor, that may not be the case.Point is, running down to a real estate attorney not versed in HUD regulatory authority (or other agencies) may not fly as initially expected.

I tend to look for your posts to hear the regulatory side of things, I prefer to stay inside of those boundaries and ethics so I sleep well at night knowing no one can touch what I've worked for.

I'm sure you'll get some more experienced replies here but just to give you a couple items to start chewing on.I believe you may have two issues here compliance/regulatory and structure.I think that by bringing in a partner that is a strictly money person, but gets no management vote (I'm assuming since he only receives a % rate return), you have effectively syndicated or something similar.

This property might be exempt from regulatory issues with seller fiancing, but could be.