SELLING the option is what is unethical in that case.If the investment was suitable for the buyer to begin with and their option is now worthless then there is nothing unethical about allowing them to exercise it and pay the difference between the spot value and the strike price.

I think something more like 1.5X is more suitable.

Can they do it now if they come to the US just as guests/visitors?

I had a section 8 tenant and she only had to pay about 10% of the $1,000 a month rent payment and over 60% of the time she never did or I had to chase her for the money, so I would prefer not to have a section 8 tenant again.The only reason I took her is because my rental management company tried to find a suitable tenant for 3 months and this was all they could find.

Several threads recently have discussed the ethical standard of suitability in real estate.

You can see the majority of my flipped properties at: http://www.wealth-steps.com/flip-that-house.htmlHowever I found that platform not very user friendly to post pictures or for visitors to leave comments so I am trying Blogger now.

All my properties have been upgraded to the degree that would be suitable for me to live in and I have gotten to personally know most people who live in the surrounding area.

He told me to speak with an attorney and determine just what kind of risk there was and let him know so they could write a suitable policy.

I've been a periodic visitor over the years and decided it's finally time to introduce myself.I'm currently a senior in college in the DC area, and I'll be starting work in NYC this summer (assuming I graduate...).

Visitors to the museum don't stay in town to hang out with the local hill billy population and sprinkle their tourist dollars on the local businesses.