I certainly disagree for @Jason Chen.

Anyway, I disagree.  

I disagree, He is discriminating in this particular case.

All he says is "Find me some more land, I want it in no less than 100 acre chunks, I just feel like it is going to boom around here".While I don't disagree, some people just are always buyers and never sellers.

Friendly disagree with this.

I tend to disagree with the theory that people will leave en-masse.

If so, you can study the materials on your own and take the examination when you please without satisfying the hourly requirement.Sorry, I took an in person accelerated course in the winter months so I can't help you with online courses.

I believe that our rates are some of the best on the east coast though.I wasn't totally disagreeing with you, there are lenders who want to acquire properties.

---Anyone agree or disagree?

Like you said though, if they place a tenant with no rental history or who's guarantor family member has an unstable rental history, or if the required qualifications and investigations are sub-par, IE the PM didn't bother to investigate rental history beyond the applicant's current residence or didn't take into account that they just started a new job in a different industry making 3x what they previously did for the past 10 years - then those are reasons to be upset.But yet again, if a landlord has to take the time to deeply examine an applicant beyond the PM saying, "yes, the applicant meets our agreed-upon criteria and here is the backup", you are working with the wrong PM because that's a big part of what a PM does.