Its just part of how we do development.. you cant take the cash flow game and make any sense of these types of transactions .. apples to oranges as it were. for instance I have a 117 acre parcel optioned at 50k an acre.. when it ripens will will be worth over 600k an acre.. and we have 1.5 mil in cash in it so far.. is that a great use for 1.5 mil don't know.. but on top of the delta on the dirt we then build homes for another 5 to 7 years and there is another 50 million in it.. so who knows.. these are small partnerships I put together with those that don't need cash flow and want small investments that have 10X returns over time totally passive.. 

It's apples to oranges as there's no way you can buy a single-family home for as little as you can buy a mobile home.

For every market, you have to compare apples to apples.

It's on a long street name, Apple Valley Road. 

So if I were you, stick to Brandon Turner's requirements to weed out the bad apples.

I have found, apples to apples, when in a park that has lower lot rent, can ask more for the same home.

That's unfortunate to hear that there are some bad apples out there. 

It seems like a apples to oranges comparison in a lot of ways to me. 

That way you're not stuck with a bad tenant for the next 12 months if one of them turns out to be a rotten apple.

-Investor wants his $ to flIp another house Asap & doesnt want to go through the F/C process-Borrower willIng to go another 18 months I/O to figure things out @$1,400/M-200K Sale all day-1st PosItIon - No 2nd-FlorIdaliterally every penny I own.