So it is safe to say, the business has to pay for 100% of it's operations, from about 7% of it's intake potential client's. 93% are JUST an expense with NO revenue produced. 

Quote from @Arkadiy Iliyayev: Thanks for the reply Jake, I really appreciate itIf you cut Brownsville in four pieces using the interstate to divide east and west and Ruben Torres to divide north and south, you'd be safe buying basically anything north of Ruben Torres with the notable exception of Cameron Park.

Is this something in all industries or more in the RE world. thankswishing everyone to stay financial safe

Fire department will inspect the property at various stages to ensure the property safe to live3.

I will probably only be budgeting to use up to $600k to be safe, which I know will be tight depending on what location is selected.

Usually, we'd be really safe and happy with our responses for someone like you but I need to make this one be a little more firm if you don't mind - you are not to do anything that you don't understand.  

I just don't think it is a safe business model UNLESS you can take the property yourself if you can't get a buyer.

It seems safe to assume there's a market, but obviously we'll need some more research to confirm that. 

The move is always whatever SAFELY leads to owning more assets.

As for the shed I was recommended to allocate it the same way split between the properties therefor making it fall under the De Minimis Safe Harbor amount of $2500 allowing me to expense the cost rather then carry it as an asset for depreciation.