Home needed work which I put into it, mostly on the lower level (I'm of the opinion that it is a tad easier to buy homes that need work as there is a certain % of the buying populace that wants move in ready).  

So I will throw it out to the collective knowledge and experience of the Bigger Pockets populace. 

What I'd focus on is the challenges with the $400/month rental populace.  

So, I'd guess that if 15% of the total tech-worker populace decides to leverage their newfound location independence, the tech companies will have no problem finding 15% more boots to deploy in the office.  

Within the greater Twin Cities, 100%, but now were talking a 5m+ populace area, and suburbs of Mpls-St.

At same time populace is getting softer, weaker, lazier.

If it can be done in 1-2 months, then that's doable.Then look at cities/counties that show a stable job market and populace.

Lots of chain restaurants have come in the last few years by demand from the base populace. 

Finally, the mindset of the general populace also plays into it.

Implemented correctly, UBI is not a threat to capitalism, it is a massive boost to capitalism.Imagine a more intelligent, more entrepreneurial populace who are now able to take more risks, start more companies, and work on more passion projects because they don't have to devote 100% of their psychological and physiological energy to ensuring their family does not starve to death.https://www.businessinsider.com/poverty-effect-on-intelligence-2013-8https://www.newscientist.com/article/2193136-universal-income-study-finds-money-for-nothing-wont-make-us-work-less/Like it or not, some form of UBI is the future.