All Forum Posts by: Aubrey P.
Aubrey P. has started 14 posts and replied 33 times.
Post: Pros and cons of mechanical vs. electronic locks for rentals

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Originally posted by @Matt B.:
I think its kwikset (but not sure) that make landlord friendly door locks. you can have it set that 1 key can open all the doors and you can easily change out the lock tumblers to rekey it. basically you have a master key, while all your doors have a different key that only opens that specific one.
I think they also make solar powered w/ back up battery electric locks that you can use if your leaning in that direction.
Thanks for the reply. I'll look into the kwikset option. A solar powered back up? That sounds interesting too.
I guess I am also more so wondering about the pros and cons of fully mechanical locks like these: http://www.kaba-adsamericas.com/solutions/mechanic...
The Kaba simplex series looks like they need no batteries and are tough. I just want something I let sit and forget about and that isn't hard to change the combo on for new renters.
Post: Pros and cons of mechanical vs. electronic locks for rentals

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Hi, I'm considering renting a property about 57 miles away on airbnb. I have an electronic keypad in my house, which works great. I basically don't carry keys anymore. It uses batteries, but I have never changed them yet.
However, for this rental property, I am concerned about battery life, as I may not be around to replace it if one stops working and a guest comes.
Can anyone recommend a good option. Or a reliable mechanical door lock they use?
Post: trump tax impact on investors? why arent we talking more about it

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Thank you, Brian.
Post: trump tax impact on investors? why arent we talking more about it

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Originally posted by @Brian Schmelzlen:
Hi Alex,
The changes to the mortgage deduction and property taxes only affect Schedule A (personal residences). It will not impact rentals, fortunately.
Just to clarify. If have a bunch of rental properties (held in name only), under the tax bill, I can still deduct property taxes (and other rental management related expenses) on each of these properties in my schedule E, is that correct? They don't need to be held in a business structure (LLC, partnership, etc.) to qualify for the deduction?
However, I am now subject to state and local taxes, and I can only deduct property taxes up to $10,000 for my primary?
I also read there is a 23% tax deduction for business entities like LLC's for pass through income (rental income). That is set to expire in 2025 though I believe. I guess it would be prudent to move all properties from name to LLC.
Post: The new tax plan, good or bad for "passive" investors

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Here's the latest information I've found:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/08/us/...
The two versions differ on how to tax “pass-through” business income that is currently taxed at the individual rate of the business’s owners. The House bill sets a lower top rate with an exception for professional service businesses like in law or accounting. The Senate bill creates a new deduction for pass-through income.
Pass through in the Senate version(most likely): 23% deduction, phasing out for professional service income beginning at $250,000. Expires after 2025.
It's a shame the House's version didn't pass with a 25% pass through tax rate.
Post: The new tax plan, good or bad for "passive" investors

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Thanks for that link. Any idea whether the new pass through rate is permanent or does it sunset at some point like some of the other items in the tax bill?
I've found a few links, but the full ramifications for a buy and hold investor/landlord are yet to be seen:
http://www.nreionline.com/nrei-wire/10-must-reads-...
Post: trump tax impact on investors? why arent we talking more about it

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
So if I own a bunch of rental properties that are all paid off (in name only not an llc) I can still deduct property taxes (on my schedule e) under this new tax plan?
Any new taxes or tax deduction or other benefits or drawbacks that as landlords or buy and hold investors we should be award of? Thanks.
Post: Inheriting RE - taxes, ownership, advice in General

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Thanks, all. Incredibly useful advice Ashish and Lance!
Post: Inheriting RE - taxes, ownership, advice in General

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Although the tax reform bill is still in conference and hasn't been passed, and the final bill will require study in conjunction with a discussion with a real estate savvy CPA to understand its implications on my particular real estate question, I am hoping someone on this thread can weigh in with some general advice. Please excuse the long post.
My close friend's parents are "buy and hold" small time landlords with a 2 commercial (1 building has three units and the other is one contiguous space) and 4 residential properties they rent out. These properties are all held jointly by their parents in their parent's names only, but each property has good liability insurance and umbrella policies.
The parents structured ownership in their name only this way partly because they were not convinced that since they handle maintenance, tenant vetting, etc themselves., that LLCs were worth setting up for each property. That there wouldn't be a huge benefit to it. With such hands on management the corporate veil protection of an LLC could be easily pierced was part of the reasoning. However, one of the residential buildings is currently held in a partnership with the parents, and their two siblings.
There are no separate bank accounts for these properties and money is just being deposited into one account., which I think needs addressing. These buildings bring in good rent, are centrally located in a major city, are well kept, and were a side business for the parents when they were working. This year they retired and are living on rental income from these properties. They've never really been strict about all the itemized deductions as landlords they could be taking (travel expenses, repairs etc.) or used spreadsheets to track things like rent. They were basically accidental landlords, who worked hard at their other professions, who were lucky to have good tenants.
These building will pass down to the sibling ( my friend) and his brother as inheritance and will be 50/50 ownership. They would like to continue on managing them. The siblings are trying to get up to speed on being future landlords. They've created excel spreadsheets to track expenses and rent. Encouraged separate bank accounts. Kept receipts for maintenance to itemize deductions etc., but I am curious as to some suggestions for the most tax advantageous methods they should be transferred the siblings.
Should ownership be transferred via forming partnerships (or LLCs? or S Corps?) for the all properties currently held in name only while the parents are living or should they just wait until after their parents have passed to assume ownership (the properties are held in a revocable trust where the siblings would simply inherit them)?
In any case, once these properties are theirs solely, should they continue to be held in name only but with high insurance polices as they are now? Or in an LLC(s)? Or Series LLC? Or in an LLC elected to be taxed as an s corp? Basically what would be a tax advantageous set up?
Any tips on property management or other way for them to get up to speed on inheriting these buildings. and how they should prepare themselves, both from a management and tax perspective would be appreciated as well.
I know a CPA is going to need to wade into the nitty gritty, as this is a complex set of questions, but any general advice is appreciated. Thank you.
Post: Inheriting RE - taxes, ownership, advice in General

- Adger, AL
- Posts 34
- Votes 2
Although the tax reform bill is still in conference and hasn't been passed, and the final bill will require study in conjunction with a discussion with a real estate savvy CPA to understand its implications on my particular real estate question, I am hoping someone on this thread can weigh in with some general advice. Please excuse the long post.
My close friend's parents are "buy and hold" small time landlords with a 2 commercial (1 building has three units and the other is one contiguous space) and 4 residential properties they rent out. These properties are all held jointly by their parents in their parent's names only, but each property has good liability insurance and umbrella policies.
The parents structured ownership in their name only this way partly because they were not convinced that since they handle maintenance, tenant vetting, etc themselves., that LLCs were worth setting up for each property. That there wouldn't be a huge benefit to it. With such hands on management the corporate veil protection of an LLC could be easily pierced was part of the reasoning. However, one of the residential buildings is currently held in a partnership with the parents, and their two siblings.
There are no separate bank accounts for these properties and money is just being deposited into one account., which I think needs addressing. These buildings bring in good rent, are centrally located in a major city, are well kept, and were a side business for the parents when they were working. This year they retired and are living on rental income from these properties. They've never really been strict about all the itemized deductions as landlords they could be taking (travel expenses, repairs etc.) or used spreadsheets to track things like rent. They were basically accidental landlords, who worked hard at their other professions, who were lucky to have good tenants.
These building will pass down to the sibling ( my friend) and his brother as inheritance and will be 50/50 ownership. They would like to continue on managing them. The siblings are trying to get up to speed on being future landlords. They've created excel spreadsheets to track expenses and rent. Encouraged separate bank accounts. Kept receipts for maintenance to itemize deductions etc., but I am curious as to some suggestions for the most tax advantageous methods they should be transferred the siblings.
Should ownership be transferred via forming partnerships (or LLCs? or S Corps?) for the all properties currently held in name only while the parents are living or should they just wait until after their parents have passed to assume ownership (the properties are held in a revocable trust where the siblings would simply inherit them)?
In any case, once these properties are theirs solely, should they continue to be held in name only but with high insurance polices as they are now? Or in an LLC(s)? Or Series LLC? Or in an LLC elected to be taxed as an s corp? Basically what would be a tax advantageous set up?
Any tips on property management or other way for them to get up to speed on inheriting these buildings. and how they should prepare themselves, both from a management and tax perspective would be appreciated as well.
I know a CPA is going to need to wade into the nitty gritty, as this is a complex set of questions, but any general advice is appreciated. Thank you.