Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Trevor Dominique

Trevor Dominique has started 19 posts and replied 43 times.

Post: Investing in expensive area.

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30
Quote from @Bob Stevens:

Impossible to get good cash flow at those numbers. Yes flipping, but make sure you are right on your numbers. IMO you should not try as you are not ready. 

All the best 

Wow. Great advice. 

Post: Investing in expensive area.

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30
Quote from @Jagnoor Gill:
Quote from @Jagnoor Gill:
Quote from @Trevor Dominique:

Are you planning to self manage? I am seeing a lot more people doing "medium term" rentals in more expensive markets right now to create some additional cash flow, charging rents anywhere from 20-100% over the fair market rent (think traveling nurses, people moving to the community and need a place while searching for their own long term residence, etc.). 

Maybe works if you plan to self manage, but if you are hiring a PM, turnover costs for this type of model would kill all your cash flow if the PM is charging a full month's rent for each turn.

I would also imagine this is partially a result of municipalities cracking down on STR's more frequently.

That’s good idea Trevor, but don’t you think there will be high vacancy rate because we are targeting only people who are in search of long term residence not the whole community. However, i think students rentals could be also a good idea, they also fall in medium term category. Although, where i live (Brampton) the biggest share in community are students.

Yes I would agree that the vacancy would be the biggest risk with this. It probably depends on the location of the property among other factors. For example, if you have a property near a big hospital, you might be able to use the medium option with a lot of luck renting to traveling nurses. Hard to say. I live in a city where a very small part of the city is zoned to legally be able to have STR's, and I think because of this, I am starting to see more medium term rentals pop up. I have never done myself. For me, I did not want to spend $5k furnishing a house just to trial something.

Post: Investing in expensive area.

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30

Are you planning to self manage? I am seeing a lot more people doing "medium term" rentals in more expensive markets right now to create some additional cash flow, charging rents anywhere from 20-100% over the fair market rent (think traveling nurses, people moving to the community and need a place while searching for their own long term residence, etc.). 

Maybe works if you plan to self manage, but if you are hiring a PM, turnover costs for this type of model would kill all your cash flow if the PM is charging a full month's rent for each turn.

I would also imagine this is partially a result of municipalities cracking down on STR's more frequently.

Post: Contractors in Greenville, SC

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30

Hi Thomas.

I suggest a guy named JP Acosta. Works with a lot of investors in the area. Guessing a quick Facebook search and you'll come across with his contact info, as well as some other investors sharing work he has done that they have been satisfied with. 

Post: Deal Analysis: Would you buy this?

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30

Hey BP,

Wanted to share the deal I am currently looking into purchasing and get your thoughts!

This is an 8 unit apartment building in a small midwestern town. The property was built in 1992, and each unit is about 600 square feet, 1 BR / 1BA. There is a decent amount of blue-collar manufacturing jobs in this town, so the assumption is that is the type of tenant I would be renting to...probably a single person who works a lot and just want a cheap/clean place to live. 

Purchase price (estimate): $370,000

Rehab: $80,000 (ultimately two of the eight units have been recently remodeled, but the remaining six units will need cosmetic updates. With the units being only 600 square feet, this $80,000 seems more than adequate.

Total Investment: $450,000

Monthly Rent: $4,800/month ($600/unit)

Monthly Expenses:

Vacancy: $144/month (3%)

Property Management: $400/month (Plan to self-manage but factoring an allowance here)

Maintenance: $400/month

Property Tax: $300/month

Insurance: $200/month

Water: $400/month

Misc/Other: $200/month


Annual Net Operating Income: $33,072

Total Investment: $450,000

Cap Rate: 7.35%

Annual Interest Expense: $13,950

Annual Profit: $19,122

Let me know your thoughts!

Post: A real estate metric I didn’t know exists.

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30

Beta is a financial metric....it can be applied to any investment, not just real estate. 

But you are correct, it is a measure of sensitivity relative to the overall market. So a beta of 1 would represent a company/investment that behaves similar to the entire market. So, for example, Tesla has a beta of 1.94, which makes sense because in a slight downturn a lot of people are going to stop buying high end vehicles. Walmart, on the other hand, has a beta of 0.48, which also makes sense because even in a downturn people are going to continue to need groceries, and since Walmart has cheap products, people will continue shopping there, which means Walmart won't experience as severe of a downturn as the average company.

If you apply that to a real estate market, I would think that cities with high tourism have high multifamily betas (maybe Nashville as an example). Whereas a city with a large supply of large, long tenured employers would have a low beta.


I'm not an expert on beta, but hope this helps. 

Post: Rent with or without utilities?

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30

I have one triplex that is not submetered so I pay all the utilities and adjust the rents upward to offset this cost. 

I just make sure that when a unit turns over, the "utilities included" part stands out and is at the top of the listing in big font. That gets prospects mentally prepared to see the higher rent amount. If the rent were the 1st thing they saw and "Utilities included" was put at the bottom of the listing, a lot of people would not even read the rest of the listing if they think the unit is out of there budget range.

Post: Tax Advice - Selling Failed Investment for Loss

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30
Ahhh so now I have another question. 

Say I sell at a $50,000 loss. In 2022, say I have $10,000 in rental income after all my deductions. I would still only get to deduct $3,000 as a capital loss? or $13,000?

Originally posted by @Holly Chan:

No change - the real estate professional rules apply to rental income/loss, not capital gain/loss.

Post: Tax Advice - Selling Failed Investment for Loss

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30
Thanks for explaining. Does anything change with the carryforward rules you are explaining if you are a real estate professional vs not?

Originally posted by @Holly Chan:
Originally posted by @Trevor Dominique:

Ashish is referring to the annual max of $3,000 net capital loss which can be taken in a given year, assuming there are no other capital gains which the loss can offset. Any disallowed losses (the $47k) get carried forward to future years and can offset future capital gains or continue to be taken $3,000 a year, if there are no other capital gains to offset. For example -

Year 1 - $50k capital loss, no other capital gains/losses = $3k capital loss taken on return, $47k carried over to future year.

Year 2- $50k capital gain, no other capital gains/losses - the $47k capital loss carry over from Year 1 reduces the capital gain to $3k to be taken on your tax return.

Alternative Year 2 - no capital gains/losses - $3k capital loss taken on return, reduces the capital loss carryover to $43k to continue carrying over to future year.

Post: Tax Advice - Selling Failed Investment for Loss

Trevor DominiquePosted
  • Investor
  • Maumee, OH
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 30
How would $47k just disappear here?

Originally posted by @Ashish Acharya:
Originally posted by @Trevor Dominique:

Hey BP,

Reaching out to get some advice from a tax strategy standpoint. 

I currently have 13 units and am looking to aggressively grow my business over these next couple years. I have one property that was a complete failure from day one. I feel like I have two options here:

Rent the property:

Downside: Significant capital tied into a deal that loses about -$200/month in negative cash flow. Upside: Area is growing rapidly, so my losses will be mitigated over time. 

Sell the property at a large loss:

Downside: Large loss shown on my tax return, potentially impacting ability to get future financing; Upside: I can redeploy some capital into higher performing projects immediately; 

After running the numbers on my side, it feels like it makes way more sense to sell the property at a large loss. Here is my justification....let's say I have $350k into this property and when I sell it, I net $300k, so I take a $50k loss. Lets say if I hold the property as a rental, it is a 2.5% cap rate. Now, let's say I sell this and purchase a property for $300k that is an 8% cap rate. If I add the $50k in losses, maybe this 8% cap rate goes down to 6% (I realize it would not actually work this way from an accounting perspective). So essentially I just repositioned $350k in debt from a 2.5% cap rate to a 6% cap rate, which is why I am leaning towards taking the loss. 

Worth noting, the debt behind the property I want to sell is a private credit line that is not attached to the property itself. So I can reuse the debt however I want to. T

Final question, and I a IMAGINE there is no legal options here but want to ask anyway. Are there any strategies so that when I sell I can keep the losses from appearing on my personal tax return? 


Thanks everyone. 


Trevor

Very high level, once everything is netted, only 3k of loss will appear in your tax return. So might not be huge issue. Again, I just assuming without knowing any other detail in your tax return.