Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tony Kim

Tony Kim has started 12 posts and replied 831 times.

Post: Why do HML charge "points" and not lend 100% LTV?

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Russell Brazil:

I'll gladly take your money for deals you are funding at 100% and charging me no points on.  Risk free for me, huge risk for you.  I can walk away from the property with none of my own money in the deal and leave you holding the bag.

This has got to be one of the funniest posts I've read on BP. Is there any way to give more than just one vote on a post?

Post: Making offers on houses but the real estate agent isn't happy

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Russell Brazil:
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Russell Brazil:

Quick way to ruin your reputation in the market place is throwing out a bunch of random low ball offers that have no correspondence to the value of the property. Amateurs do that, not professionals. 

 Russell,  when I owned my last brokerage, I could always tell when a guru came through town.. my agents were getting these calls from investors who were going to buy all these properties.. the rookies get all excited.. my way of managing them was to help them flush out the real investor from the wanna be no money tire kicker time waster.. so I would tell them your not writing 5 offers a week until you bring this investor in for an interview with me personally..   So I taught them how to vette investors.. 80% in our market were dreamers who would have wasted my agents time and probably blown them out of the industry chasing rainbows and dreams.. But we also had American Homes for rent ack guy come in .. now that was one to work with.. they ended up buying about 300 to 400 homes that is someone you can work with or for.. 

 Jay, spot on...every time Than Merrill or Robert Kyosaki or one of the guru seminars comes through town I get flooded with calls since Im the agent in the area that works with investors.  I typically dont even answer calls from unknown numbers for about a week when I see they have a seminar. Their enthusiasm wanes within a week then my phone goes back to normal.  The ones who do have the enthusiasm after a week, if they still get in touch with me and want to write 5 offers a week, I tell them cool, I'll do that for $350 per offer.  That usually makes them go some place else.

A lot of people in this thread bragged that they got properties way under what their agent said was too low.  That doesnt show me that a strategy of lowballing is a viable strategy...that just shows me that they hired agents who dont know how to value a property. Ive got 4 deals in the last year where we purchased $250k, $100k, $100k and $100k under list.  On that $250k under list we started $400k under on our offer. This was not lowballing, this was determining what the value of the property was as determined by the market, and creating a strategy to get the price to within the range of reality.  Like @James Wise said, it isnt me or anyone else who determines what a property's value is....the market determines that, plain and simple.

I had another client earlier this year, he wanted to write an offer on a property listed at $413k. He wanted to come in at $400k. Doesnt sound like much of a lowball right? Well I told him that the property was going to sell for nearly $100k more than that. He thought I was crazy. It sold for $517k with a $15k subsidy.  I dropped that client, as I do with all clients who think they know better and dont want to deal with the reality of the market.  The guy had done 1 flip, so he thought he was an expert and thought I obviously had no clue what I was talking about. Well the market proved me right.  Im not perfect by any means, but most of the time, in my market, Im mostly right on what something will sell for. The times I am wrong are usually when the purchaser is an overseas investor who are just trying to buy a hard US asset to get money out of China, and they dont necessarily care about even getting within $50k of the assets real value. They just want the money here and in something tangible.

So here we have 2 examples. $400k under list was not a lowball. On the other property you could have offered $75k over and it would have been a lowball.  People need to learn to value properties completely independent of what the list price is. The list price might, or might not have any relation to what the value of the property is.  It could be spot on, way under or way over.

Interesting points. So where do you draw the line between the kind of low-balling which you don't like vs. adding value via purchasing below market value? As a passive investor, I do not do any of the above, nor do I do much active buying and selling of real estate via direct ownership. However, I thought purchasing distressed properties below market value (a.k.a., Instant Equity) was one of the core concepts being taught here on BP? Or do you believe in an efficient market that for the most part, prevents people from purchasing below market value? This strategy can't be limited to just wholesalers, can it?

Post: Women as landlords and flippers

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015

This thread is a perfect, real-life example of the stuff women have to deal with on a regular basis. And like a lot of other real-life situations, often the well-intentioned fellow does things without realizing it. 

"Pretty eyes", "sweet talk"??? With these statements, you might think you are being nice, but what you are also doing is objectifying women.

I sometimes see a difference in the way our contractors and agents talk to me vs my wife. Also, for some reason, they often feel the need to run my wife's instructions by me before proceeding.  But they sure as heck never run my instructions by my wife when I tell them to do something.

Post: Why You Shouldn't Leverage When Investing In Turnkey Rentals

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015

What are the rates these days on non-recourse loans?  Unless we are talking about something south of 5%, I don't see the point in leveraging turnkey. The key is to find a provider you can trust that is operating in a relatively untapped market and provides BEST in class PM services.  Satisfy the above with no leverage and you'll have a property that provides some of the best long term risk adjusted returns. 

Post: Better to buy out of state and rent it out or buy a place for me?

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Nancy Lucca:

I like the way u think. Yeah I definitely don’t want to be priced out of California. Or more specifically OC/LA area for that matter. And I almost have the down payment needed on a 3 bed 2 bath condo. and so sick of the rent increases, I just want to be locked in with 1 payment. What about property taxes? I hear those go up too but by how much? Nowhere near ($1200 a year/$100 a month) which is what the rent increases are doing.

This is exactly the same reason why I bought a condo in mid-Wilshire back in 2010. I knew prices were low, so I wanted to lock in a monthly mortgage payment that wouldn't change for 30 years. I purchased the property with no expectation of appreciation (real estate fell out of vogue at that time). I lived in the property for two years and then rented it out.....little did I know it would increase in value almost 3-fold while providing me with very nice cash flow.

Of course, at this stage in the current real estate cycle, I'm not sure if this is still a good strategy. If you truly want to lock in a set monthly payment with very minimal increases in taxes and HOA dues, then I say go for it. This is an extreme example, but in 15 years, your rent might be almost double what it is now, but your monthly mortgage payment will be the same.

If you decide to purchase out of state, really spend some time researching what you are getting yourself into...specifically, look into what kinds of exit strategies are available. You have to view properties in the Midwest with a different mind-set than when buying a home or condo in CA. All I'm gonna say about that is that given how strong our current real estate cycle is this time around, it is the perfect, rare opportunity to sell any properties that fit the Roofstock or HomeUnion profile.

Post: Have Real Estate prices peaked?

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Caleb Heimsoth:
@David Smit

To answer your question long term we aren’t going to pay for all that. Taxes will he raised sometime in the mid to late 2020s , and SS and Medicare will either be gutted or benefits reduced probably roughly 25 percent

 you need to work harder to make sure my SSI is not gutted.. or reduced we are counting on you guys and gals to pull us through

 Yeah, and if my SSI is gutted, I'll just go on Medicaid. So one way or another, you youngsters better start BRRRing! 

Post: 27 y/o Female – 50k debt to $1M+ net worth (24 units,50 deals/yr)

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Arianne L.:

@Jason G. Will likely be around 50% of gross profit after all team member compensation, marketing, education expenses, other overhead, etc. in 2018. 

Our gross profit #s are taken from net flip/rehab profit (after all interest expenses, realtor expenses, closing costs, rehab costs, etc.), gross wholesale profits, without taking marketing, team member compensation, other overhead out.

50% of over 1 million......hmmm, if anyone deserves the rock-star moniker here on BP, it is you and your husband! I am blown away by what you've accomplished! 

Post: Do people ever learn? (Memphis market observation).

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
@Dean Letfus

Glad I read this thread. I was looking at Memphis but I’ll stay on the west coast =)

Any areas in Memphis (Zipcode) that you feel are worth evaluating?

Have you given any thought to investing in other areas like Ohio? There is a turnkey provider in Toledo whose team actually lives in the same area as their properties. 

Post: Do people ever learn? (Memphis market observation).

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Joel Owens:

This topic shows again and again on BP over the years where people talk about buying these low end houses in suspect areas in the hopes of making it big. Then some time later you see maybe one post about (problem with the properties now) or nothing at all then CRICKETS.

I have literally seen hundreds of these topic posts over the years. The sad thing is if the investors just invested in better areas and locations the equity growth usually way outpaces cash flow returns over time and the headache tends to be much less for the earned overall annual yield.

As for searching for properties to buy it tends to be the same in every asset class. Sellers are looking for the inexperienced and the suckers. They want to sell at a high valuation for a quick buck even if the property is a dog with little to no upside potential. On the commercial side I look for the DIAMONDS for my buyers. I find they represent maybe 20% of the market and the rest of the properties are just overvalued right now. Sellers specifically love unsophisticated buyers and also those that are poor planners with 1031 exchanges looking to buy something quick to avoid a larger tax penalty. When contacting owners to sell off market often the good stuff they do not want to sell. They instead want to sell the crap at bad valuations. They know it is bad they are just looking for the newbies and inexperienced. 

The seasoned investors tend to always be in buy mode however the velocity of the buying can change with the real estate cycles and so can tweaking the investment strategy somewhat. The investors stay true to their core investing philosophy but tend to make minor tweaks along the way.

So I am looking for deals for clients the numbers just are larger in millions to tens of millions in price per property.

I am seeing so many of these guru seminars like I did in 2004 to 2007 run up. Deals were getting harder to find so most of these house flippers went to writing books and selling courses to make the majority of the money. They touted the huge returns (grand slams) and make it seem like an everyday occurrence. They MAXIMIZE the story telling of the huge deals and  MINIMIZE the downsides and everyday smaller returns where if one thing goes wrong you could lose money rather than make it. Lot's of these course trainers increase networks so by having the ants marching (newbie investors) they might be able to partner when the newer investor finds a great deal or better yet buy it off of them for a minimal assignment fee.

If people have little money but a lot of time they may want to look into AIR BNB type stuff or vacation rentals. Those are not passive by any means and laws are constantly changing but some investors are making high cash flow returns in great areas with some equity growth built in versus owning low income dumps in higher crime areas. I know there are some investors on here who thrive on lower income tenants and investments and tout them as great. My 15 years of experience in real estate and talking with thousands of investors over the years has shown one common theme. It is a small, and I mean very small percentage of investors who have the skillset to handle lower income type tenants, properties, and locations and make money with it. I would tend to say about 90% lose their shirt and walk or run away with their tail tucked between their legs with a small to big loss to show for it. I see it now on Facebook people getting all excited about some dumb seminar coming into town touting itself as free tickets. They go there and ask them in the back room to run up their credit cards by calling companies and asking for credit limit increases etc.  

Here is the main issue.. again for some reason todays investor at least on BP has it pounded into their head that appreciation is gambling and that cash flow is everything.. I would really like to know who preaches that or where these folks are learning this and why they bite on it.. is it because of the once in 200 year melt down in 08 to 2010.. ?? At the end of the day cash flow while nice for the small investor. the only way they really get financially free is with big run up in appreciation or they hurry their behinds off and get the houses paid for.. So they have true equity.. I mean look at all the big SUPER SMART syndicators we see on BP.. and their deals were is the money made to make the nice 15 to 25% IRR's that folks are investing in their deals for.. ITS made with a raise in value caused by a serious raise in rents and for appreciation and market driven lower of cap rates..

I for one cant figure out why anyone buys a property with no expectation of appreciation and does not care about it.. you need it to come out on top when and if you exit.. 

I agree with your statement above Jay.

I think part of the reason BP preaches cash flow over appreciation is that it is much easier to get started investing for cash flow. The bottom line is that you need far less initial capital to begin investing for cash flow. If this place was all about capital appreciation, then half the members would be priced out due to the high amount of capital required to just acquire one property...let alone scale into multiple properties.  Thus, the core strategy that is pushed here is to start with as little as possible, leverage it out as much as you can, and earn your few hundred per door, paydown the loan as much as you can, pull out equity to purchase more properties, and keep repeating. Not a bad strategy because it obviously works for many people....but it's just not for me.

Post: Can I claim depreciation on a condo?

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015

You can definitely claim depreciation expense once you put the property into service.

The basis for depreciation is the lesser of the FMV at the time when the property is put into service vs. the original cost. Since you're in San Jose, I'm willing to bet that your original cost is the lower of the two.

Use your tax assessor bill to determine the percentage that is considered land (non-depreciating) and the percentage that is considered depreciating rental property.