Hey, if this helps filter out some of the pretenders in the industry or folks to want to try being an agent because no other company will hire them, then that's great. I get really frustrated dealing with folks to don't know WTF they are doing. The buying agent when we sold our home two years ago was about as incompetent as I've ever seen. She even sent a long-ranting letter to our listing agent, screaming about how lucky she didn't recommend her clients from breaking escrow, etc, etc. About as unprofessional as I've ever seen.
As someone who is currently relatively active in purchasing properties overseas, I really have to bring up the fact that the system here in America is typically unique. But then, it wouldn't be American if our system was totally different from the rest of the world, right?
Where I purchase, there is no such thing as a 'buyer's agent". 1% or 1.5% max commission to the agent and that's pretty much it. You do a search online, find what you're interested in and set up a viewing with the agent. Do you really need a buyer's agent to do something like this? I certainly don't. If you like it, you buy it. Hopefully you are sensible enough to evaluate the property and run comps yourself. Closing fees are much lower also. Buying a property in California leads to two-inch thick binder of paperwork you have to sign (in fairness, in places like Ohio, the buying process is pretty easy). What value does a buying agent really provide? Is he or she going to protect you from making a bad purchase? Maybe, but some agents will actually push you to make a less than ideal purchase. This NAR settlement is a step toward the right direction.
We are in the market to purchase a new property in SoCal... it'll be interesting what the listing agent I'm working with has to say about this ruling. Is she in the James Wise camp? Or is she in the other camp.