Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tim Viviano

Tim Viviano has started 3 posts and replied 14 times.

Post: LLC and piercing the corporate veil

Tim VivianoPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Godfrey, IL
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 5

Thanks everyone! Based on these comments I'm almost wishing I'd have stuck with my umbrella instead of forming an LLC. My wife and I are there sole partners so I don't think there's much benefit and there's a huge loss in cash flow switching to a 15 year amortization commercial loan versus the 30 year loans we had previously.

Post: LLC and piercing the corporate veil

Tim VivianoPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Godfrey, IL
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 5

I am interested in hearing opinions (not legal advice of course) if you have the time to respond. If I purchase a rental in my name, keep the loan for it personally, and deed the property to my LLC does that make it easier for someone suing the LLC to "pierce the corporate veil" and come after me?

My lawyer said it would and I trust her legal opinion, but I hear of so many people doing this so are they just more at risk? Or is it more of a "yes but low llikelihood" type of gamble? Or, is she just wrong?

Post: Refi to consolidate HELOC

Tim VivianoPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Godfrey, IL
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 5

@Jeff Dulla Thanks for the blended rate that's helpful. As far as rate goes, 4.75 on a 20 yr cash out seems to be the standard I've seen so far. I've mainly been shopping closing costs seeing how much of their fees lenders would waive. As far as the second goes I currently have no plans to pay it off faster, but, I didn't know if there was some "hack" I was missing where it would make sense to keep the first at the lower rate but still get the HELOC paid off quicker than what I'm able to do without refinancing it. I Googled to see if there were any tricks I was missing on getting the HELOC paid off faster (other than additional financing) but came up empty so I figured I'd ask the pros here. I vaguely remember, a very long time ago, debt consolidation companies using HELOCs to consolidate credit card debt and doing something like having your paycheck deposited into the HELOC and paying bills from there. That was supposed to pay it down faster or something. I'm really hazy on the specifics and came up empty searching. Makes me think I made it up.

Post: Refi to consolidate HELOC

Tim VivianoPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Godfrey, IL
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 5

Hi everyone! I've been on BiggerPockets reading forum posts pretty much every day since I joined a few weeks ago. It's incredible how much I didn't know I didn't know. I have a question about possibly refinancing now that I have about 80% equity in my main residence. When I purchased back before the crash I took out an 80/20 loan, the 20% being a HELOC, so I could buy with nothing down. My first mortgage balance is ~168K with 21 years left @4.375 and the 2nd is ~34K variable at about 10% right now I believe. The 2nd converts to payback in 2024. Total payments are about $1280 with PI on the 1st and int only on the 2nd. Does it make sense to refinance the sum at 4.75 for 20? That payment would be ~$1305 and I'd shave a year off my 1st and actually pay back the 2nd instead of int only (plus the occasional principal payment). It makes sense to do so to me but like I said previously, I don't know what I don't know. It seems weird to raise the rate on the bulk of the $$ though so I was wondering if there's something else I should do instead. All of this is conventional lending. TIA!