Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tim Bee

Tim Bee has started 15 posts and replied 171 times.

Post: Las Vegas Rental properties

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94
Quote from @Trevor Richardson:

If you take a macro approach at the western US. Vegas is the most affordable city, anyone see it any different? It’s outside the most expensive state in the US. Like can you think of a city in Washington, Oregon, California, Utah, Idaho, Arizona that’s more affordable than Vegas, with 2 million people MSA?

That alone has to be an attractor to investors looking for upside in a market. The city is growing like crazy (cause it's affordable and again outside the most populated state). Reno is more expensive for rents, and median SFR sales.

My conclusion. Vegas is the best market in the west for value investors. In comparison for Nevada, Reno has more niche stability (Tesla just announced its investing $3.8 billion more here) and is a hotbed for the wealth out of the Bay Area. Which causes prices to be high and returns low. When I underwrite properties in Vegas I typically get a 1% range higher cap rate.


Parts of CA actually have SFRs that make the 1% rule.  Gotta stay away from  SF, LA and places like those though. 

Post: New to real estate. Where do I start ?

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Stick to the 1% rule.  Unless you are flipping or holding for capital gains always stick to the 1% rule.  Realtors even on here will always try to sell you on the reasons to buy something that doesn't meet that rule.   Don't listen to them.  I still today, even in California am able to find houses that meet that expectation.

Post: Floodplain Homes

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Too risky,  Stay away from a flood plain.  

Post: When They Ask: Is It Going to Be A Rental?

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

There's always a hidden agenda.  They'll usually do a half a$$ job if they know it's a rental.  

Post: New to Real Estate Investing

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Stick to the 1% rule and don't settle for less is probably the most important rule to follow.  If you can do this it's almost garenteed success.

Post: Who would you like to see speak as a keynote at BPCon?

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Robert Kiyosaki

Post: Canadian Investor in Detroit

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Very high violent crime in Detroit.  Lots of strong storms.  High maintenance costs.  I know it's cheap but all these factors have to be considered.

Post: 1 or 2 Bedrooms for MTRs

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Stick to 3bd/2bath.  Less turn over.  Stay away from the smaller dwellings.  You can loose a ton of money in too many frequent vacancies.  

Post: Taxes, Multi-Family Live-In, and LLC???

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Texas has pretty high property taxes compared with many other states.

Post: Question about the 1% Rule

Tim BeePosted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 94

Multi family properties should AT LEAST meet the 1% rule. They should actually exceed the 1% rule in my opinion. Maybe be around 1.2-1.5%. A SFR doesn't have all the community items that a multi-unit will have. With a mulit-unit you (the owner) have to pay for yard care, trash and possibly some other community items that eat away at your cash flow. On all my single families the tenant takes care of the yard, pays for the trash and of course pays all the utilities.