Originally posted by Corey Dutton:
Case #2 you presented. This sounds kind of "loan sharky" but I know other lenders that do this. It's almost like you're making the loan and hoping the borrower will default?? We don't change our terms like that but I know there are some lenders who do that. Any one else have thoughts on this one?
Plenty of lenders change terms, for better and worse, to match the risk associated with the loan. The lender can be a bank, agency lender (Freddie/Fannie, SBA, or HUD, etc.), or a HML. In fact, the practice is quite common in this market. Perhaps not so much in the residential sector, which I am curious to know if it is, but it happens in CRE.
Now, I'm not saying a lender should be a "bait and switch" operation. I don't agree with that, but there's also nothing wrong with adjusting the terms of a loan as the facts present themselves. This is one of the ways a lender mitigates its risk.
I've seen terms improve on a loan if an appraisal comes in high or if the payoff is lower than expected, but I've also see terms deteriorate if an appraisal comes in low or there are issues with credit, assets, etc.
That doesn't make the lender a shark. Not if the reason(s) to adjust the terms are valid.