Hi everyone,
I'm in the early stages of deciding where I want to focus my initial efforts in REI. Specifically, I want to evaluate a few markets for the purpose of buy-and-hold, cash-flow investment in residential properties (single-family houses or 2- to 4-unit multi-family properties), so I'm curious about the process employed by other investors to assess and contrast a handful of markets when determining where to invest. In particular:
- Exactly which factors/data did you consider?
- How did you prioritize this information?
- Why did you adopt this particular approach?
- Would you do things differently today?
Please note, I understand that ...
- There is no 'one-size-fits-all' methodology.
- Opinions will differ widely with respect to which factors one should consider, and the relative importance of each.
- Circumstances and objectives will vary from investor-to-investor, and from market-to-market.
- A high-level analysis of a city's real-estate market has limited utility since 'all real estate is local' and opportunity exists in most every city.
That said, I still think it would be instructive to learn about the thought process and methodology employed by others when analyzing the potential of various real-estate markets. From what I've read thus far, REI authors touch on this subject in only the most general terms -- i.e. to evaluate a market, one should consider population growth, economic conditions, infrastructure, average cap rates, housing supply and demand, the legal environment, etc. While such guidelines are a good starting point, hearing a few examples would be helpful.
Thanks,
Scott...
Note: I don't think it's relevant to the question, but if you're curious, the markets I'm interested in contrasting are as follows:
Phoenix AZ
Tucson AZ
Charlotte NC
Charleston SC
Portland OR
Vancouver WA
Dallas TX