Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Sylvia H.

Sylvia H. has started 8 posts and replied 140 times.

Quote from @Jonathan R McLaughlin:

this is--complicated. 

1) I don't know CA but MA has some of the strictest lead laws in the nation so it may be comparable. You may be looking at "strict liability" meaning any kid in that apartment that has elevated lead levels can hold you responsible, they don't have to prove that it was from the house and indeed it very likely wouldn't be. 

2) with the tenants aware of this and needing it remediated you are going to have to do so, pretty much immediately if there is a kid in there or about to be. In MA I think you have 90 days before your liability kicks in. Don't quote,  me this is from memory and I'm not a lawyer...but its something like that. This is going to be true even if your seller is provably at fault and you can hold them financially responsible. It is your problem now. Oh by the way, this often applies to any child under 6 just visiting :)

3) First call to a lead remediation company which can examine and make recommendations. Its not always grotesquely expensive. There is interim control, painting only certain areas etc. often around door frames and older windows...but it can be tens of thousands of dollars in a worst case scenario.

4) Second call to a qualified attorney who specializes in this area. Pay him/her, do not go cheap and find a generalist or a brother in law or what have you. Let them guide you. 

5) Get moving quickly on both ends (the remediation and the attorney) immediately and my gut is you will be able to hold the seller accountable. This is one of those rare areas where it can be pretty cut and dried and in their best interest to provide you some financial relief. And they are flush from the sale now as well.

You never know, it might be a long ago citation for a minor thing that was painted over and this will be a trifle, but....

6) Get the tenants on your side by doing everything within deadlines and keeping them in the loop. Its going to matter. FYI you will likely be responsible for providing them housing during the entire remediation process, short or long.

7) Seriously, people have many ways of dealing with this before its a documented issue, but once it is public it has to be handled properly. You are tremendously exposed. It may be next to nothing but don't be shocked if the bill is all out of keeping with what you think of as the scope of work. The company performing the work takes on the liability and they are going to charge you for it. DO NOT get the same work done by an uncertified company even if its just as good...it doesn't cover you and will hurt your resale value.

8) I'm writing this from a liability perspective. The medical issues surrounding actual lead poisoning are devastating and you have a moral obligation to deal. 

9) I'm talking about liability more than health because we all grew up in houses with lead paint and actual poisoning was rare.  And even pre 78 houses have had so many renovations stuff is often buried under layers of changes and isn't a practical problem with reasonable parenting and reasonable maintenance. This cuts both ways though--for something to be elevated to public record means it often gets heightened attention.

10)'acceptable' levels have been lowered and lowered and so even though kids may not have had major exposure as youths the standard is much different now. Acceptable levels have ranged from 20s and are now at 2-4 to give you an idea of how different things are now.

Good luck, do not panic, but face head on and quickly

Hi there. It's not a huge deal. You can fix that and get a clean bill of health from the city. The lawsuit question should go to the attorney as none of us are attorneys in your state.  Just a hunch says the seller should be liable. You were somewhat warned because the real estate contract said "may contain lead". In a situation where the seller had no prior knowledge of lead paint then it would have been up to you to further investigate it before closing on the home.  Your argument would be that he did know and that he was notified by the city that he needed to remediate and he should have told you. Instead of being clear he vaguely hinted at it. I'm very surprised the lender didn't pick up on this and ask for testing as a condition to close. I would have. 
Quote from @Kerwin Butts:
Quote from @Sylvia H.:
Quote from @Kerwin Butts:

Good Evening BiggerPockets Family, I'm new to the forums and have been looking to see if I can find a solution to my current problem. I have a 2 unit, 1b, 1bth duplex in Jennings, MO that I acquired back in July. Now I should preface this by saying I've learned from this experience and l'm still learning as I've only been doing this a few months. With that being said. I acquired this property with a HML and about 30K for the rehab budget. The rehab was two months in and a little over budget when the units were broken into and major items including the pipes, water heater and condensers were stolen. Insurance isn't covering anything and I'm hoping there's a solution to resolving this where I can fund the damages and complete the rehab and keep the property even if it takes some time to recoup the loss. What are my options or vehicles available to me? If any? I welcome and appreciate all feedback.

Hi there. Sorry this happened to you. Why isn't your insurance covering this loss? I can't imagine why they wouldn't. If you could just let me know why I would know better on how to proceed. Thanks

 Hey Sylvia, according to the insurance company since I didn't have the property for more than three months there was nothing they could do since the policy I had (which @Michael Norris nailed) was a vacant policy and all it covered was vandalism and not the theft. Even though they did rip pipes out of the walls. That is still considered theft. What I was told was that if it had been three months and day after acquiring the property they would have covered it. Go figure. Definitely a learning experience.

Thank you all for your feedback. Now I'm just trying to figure of how I can come up with creative way to generate capital to continue the renovations.

KB

Oh dear. Its a learning experience for me as well because I have never heard of such a thing. I would push back on that. I don't think it's reasonable to expect that when you get insurance there is a probationary period. Never heard of such a thing. I wish I had a suggestion for you but honestly I'm stumped. Bank of Mom and Dad? I would still contact your insurance regulatory agency within your state and get confirmation on that. 
Quote from @Kerwin Butts:

Good Evening BiggerPockets Family, I'm new to the forums and have been looking to see if I can find a solution to my current problem. I have a 2 unit, 1b, 1bth duplex in Jennings, MO that I acquired back in July. Now I should preface this by saying I've learned from this experience and l'm still learning as I've only been doing this a few months. With that being said. I acquired this property with a HML and about 30K for the rehab budget. The rehab was two months in and a little over budget when the units were broken into and major items including the pipes, water heater and condensers were stolen. Insurance isn't covering anything and I'm hoping there's a solution to resolving this where I can fund the damages and complete the rehab and keep the property even if it takes some time to recoup the loss. What are my options or vehicles available to me? If any? I welcome and appreciate all feedback.

Hi there. Sorry this happened to you. Why isn't your insurance covering this loss? I can't imagine why they wouldn't. If you could just let me know why I would know better on how to proceed. Thanks

Post: Book Keeping for your Rentals

Sylvia H.Posted
  • Posts 142
  • Votes 61
Quote from @Matt Sora:

What do you do for book keeping for your first rentals?


 Any spreadsheet will do. People don't make your life more complicated than it needs to be. A simple spreadsheet where you write down the amount of rent taken in and the expenses. I like Numbers because it is a spreadsheet with the ability to insert notes on each imput item. Good luck

Quote from @Kendrick Okafor:

Hello everyone, I’ve been debating back and forth whether to sell my property or not. 

I own a 3/2 1200sqft sfh in Ft. Lauderdale built in 1958 that I purchased in 2020 for 235k. I put a new roof and did minor upgrades on the interior, paint ceiling fans etc. Fast forward, I got married and moved in with my wife who had a newly built town home. 

I’ve rented the place to friends short term (month to month) but now it’s gonna be vacant next month. My long term goal is to have enough properties to cash flow about 6 to 10k per month. I’m mid 30’s and do about 90k per year at my full time, my wife does about the same. The property can sell for about 350-385k right now. My mortgage is about 180k 3.5% interest rate. My monthly expenses are about 1600 (tax insurance mortgage). Rents currently are from 2300 to 2700 per month. Airbnb seems to be about 120-150 per night. I want to own more properties and considering the age of the property, the equity, and the tax situation was considering selling to get more capital to invest and have ready if the market dips a bit next year.

1) Do I sell now and take the profit and try to purchase 2 properties next year? (I was thinking I’d be able to take the profits tax free since I owned it as a primary for over 2 years).

2) Spruce it up a bit and get it ready for new tenants to lease annually? ( it’s gonna likely need paint, new washer/dryer and stove)

3) Fix it up and furnish it for str abnb? Not my fav option because I’d have to put a lot of money and time into it to furnish and manage and I don’t have a pool and I’m not sure I’d get more than 150 per night and with vacancies that’d be comparable to annual lease rates.

Thanks I’m advance for taking the time to read my post and share your thoughts and opinions.

It's never going to be worth in the short run more than it is right now. The market is slowing down with rates going up. Your call. 

Post: Mortgage Company Requiring Insurance in Personal Name

Sylvia H.Posted
  • Posts 142
  • Votes 61
Quote from @Will Chitwood:

We own all our properties in LLCs with mortgages in our personal names as we switched them to the LLC after purchase. We never had problems with mortgage companies accepting the insurance in our LLC names until this year. 2 of them sent letters saying we have to have the insurance in our personal names which opens us up to liability exposure. We could have us as primary on the policy with the LLC as additionally insured but I don't like the exposure that gives us. Is anyone else having this happen and are there any solutions or workarounds other than refinancing at higher interest rates to a commercial loan or paying the property off?

I have many LLC's and have no problem as my insurance company lists my name and the name of the LLC. Keep in mind you are not hiding anything by not putting your name on it because anyone looking to sue you will see you own the LLC when they look it up. Try putting your name and the LLC. 

Ask the person doing the work to snap a photo when they are done. People will do it if they know it’s a condition of payment 

Quote from @Catherine Maria:

Hi, I recently inherited a 6 unit apartment building that is located in a prime East coast location. Three of the 6 tenants have been there for a long time and the previous owners chose to forgo raising rental fees on a regular basis. Since the building is now under new ownership my real estate attorney informed me that I can increase rental fees above the 3 to 5% norm, for those who are significantly under current market rental rates. One tenant is at least $1K under market and the other two are $700 under market. The state has no limit on rental fee increases; the critera is that the tenant may not consider it unconscionable. The attorney cited an example of a landlord who purchased a property, raised rental fees by 20% and the tenants hired attorneys to contest and the landlord negotiated a lesser increase. Based on thousands of dollars invested in improvements and repairs, I believe I can substantiate a 20% increase. However, I also am concerned about relations with my tenants and want to avoid additional attorney fees to address tenant opposition. I would love to hear others' perspectives. Thanks in advance. 

Hi there. You are a new owner so you are allowed to bring the rents to market. Make sure that the rent you want to charge is comparable to what is out there that is similar in area, style and square footage to yours. If I lived in an apartment and paid a nominal amount of rent, I would know it and expect a new owner to go to market when the property changed hands. I guarantee you the first thing all of them did when the property changed hands was check out apartment prices. If they are the same as what you are charging them, why would they move? The will have to come up with two months security deposit, pay movers, go through all the hassle of applying for apartments just so they can move somewhere that's the same price as what you are charging them. Don't be afraid to charge them what the apartment is worth. This is a business, not a charity. lol
Quote from @Ash S.:

1. How frequently you are getting property inspections done? Quarterly or once in six months or yearly? Or when there are some repairs done and you want to validate the repairs?

2. Rather than doing inspections what if you ask tenants to provide the images and notes?

3. What if tenants don't provide the images and notes?

4. How much advance notice you need to provide to the tenants before inspections?

5. What if tenants are given 1-2 weeks notice but even then tenants are not willing to let you for property inspection?

Whew so many questions. I inspect every year. Obviously if there is a complaint or concern I would give them 24 hours notice and then come in for an inspection. If you put in your lease that they have to let you in for inspections with 24 hours notice you should be fine and it's enforceable. Don't be an over zealous pain. If you have a good tenant and they are keeping the unit clean and not bothering anyone then you don't need to be popping in all the time. I'm not sure what you mean about images and notes. Are you talking about when work is completed?  I ask the person doing the work to snap a photo and text it to me and they do. I would never ask my tenant to do that. 

Post: House Hack finance Question

Sylvia H.Posted
  • Posts 142
  • Votes 61
Quote from @Katrina Sokolosky:
Quote from @Sylvia H.:
Quote from @Katrina Sokolosky:

Hi! I am in the process of trying to purchase my 1st multi family house hack.

My plan is to take a HELOC on my current single family home & rent it out. And move I to the multi-family.

I reached our to a mortgage lender & he is saying the only way I can purchase a multi-family is to purchase a single home with a separate accessory unit on the property (like a separate cottage or such) versus a duplex/triplex.

I need to take advantage of the 3.5% down in order to make this work.

Why would it have to be a separate accessory on the property vs a duplex/triplex?

I'm Confused?

Thanks in Advanced,

Katrina 

Your lender is correct. No one will believe that you are moving out of a single family to a multi family. Underwriters are smart, they know you are trying to buy an investment property with 3.5 percent down. 

 Thanks for the insight.  I can understand that point of view.   That is not my intention.   My intention is to create a new life in a new area for myself.  And house hacking makes this doable for my situation.  I appreciate that point of view and definitely helps me understand the reasoning from uw.   

If you moved to a new area say 100 or so miles away you might be able to pull it off but it has to make sense. Are you moving because of a job? If not they will wonder how far is this new home away from your current job. The job that you are using to qualify for this loan? They will think you are committing mortgage occupancy fraud which is a serious crime punishable to up to 30 years in prison. I know it sounds crazy but its real. If you tell a lender you are going to live in the property you really need to live there. Also just an FYI there are investment programs you can do with 10 to 15 percent down. Rate might be a bit higher but you can do it. Best of luck to you!