Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Susan O.

Susan O. has started 69 posts and replied 547 times.

http://futurewise.org/

FUTUREWISE - Entitlement group, promoting rent control in Seattle "Housing is a HUMAN right" "We don't care if you've worked hard to get your house, we're coming for it, others deserve it"

Housing Affordability Outreach & Mobilization InternWe are seeking an intern to work closely with our staff on housing affordability issues in Seattle from mid-May 2017 through August 2017. The Outreach & Mobilization Intern will gain first-hand experience in on-the-ground outreach, coalition politics, and housing policy.

http://cesinaction.org.dnnmax.com/IssuesActivities....

http://seattlemag.com/article/it-time-bring-back-r...

Post: Why Seattle Sucks

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by @Ryland Taniguchi:

In my lovely area of Seattle, the city council and the entire state government here are socialists. I live in the People's Republic of Seattle. The liberal government here believes that it is evil to make a profit.

1) Labor and Industries is a bullying mafia machine. According to my attorney, they are going after rehabbers this year. LNI believes that investors have a pile of cash and they believe you should hand over your money. With the amount of harassment and bullying that goes on, it amazes me that someone has not sued them yet and  go personally after the assets of a harassing LNI inspector. I recorded a conversation where an LNI inspector was basically putting down our subcontractor because they were African American. We will never have affordable housing in Seattle because LNI increases the cost by 40%. Oh that's right, LNI is hard to sue because they are represented by the Attorney General.

2) AirBNB. The city of Seattle wants to restrict what you can Airbnb.

3) Rent Control. The next move will be rent control in Seattle on commercial apartments.

4) Equity Skimming. They don't believe you should make a profit as an investor so they restrict it so you cannot buy that good of a deal without violating the Distressed Home Consultant Law.

5) SEC Blue Sky laws. You have to file a Reg D rule 506(c) to borrow money from a private lender who is not in the normal business of lending. A little overboard?

6) Planning Departments. Seattle is okay here. But we keep hearing rumors that planning departments like Tacoma are so busy and they are blaming the investors. I have heard a rumor that they are purposely sabotaging investor permits so the investors go away. I am not so sure these are true but I have heard this more than once.

Interestingly, the government here wants to blame investor for causing the crash. Ironically, we will keep having real estate crashes because OF the government. As long as we run the printing press through qualitative easing, we will continually be going through real estate bubbles.

The sad thing is that these liberal policies make the rich richer. So while you do everything to try to bring the investor down, the reality Washington State is that you are making us wealthier. Keep restricting the supply of properties through your liberal laws and I will keep watching my properties go up in value. Supply and demand. 

I have traveled the over 58 countries and Seattle is the most beautiful place on the planet. So I do love living here in Seattle. I've also run a business in the socialistic country of Australia and we here in Seattle are making some strides towards socialism. 

They're backed by a lot of these entitlement programs.  It's like the less you work the more reward you get.  All economist agree these policies are actually negative in long term for communities.  Especially for home owners, and anyone who has a long term stake in a community/neighborhood.  Just look at the slums in NYC and Boston when you concentrate a welfare state

Their new slogans are "HOUSING IS A HUMAN RIGHT" 

Their answer when asked how are you suppoesed to afford that? is TAX THE RICH.

Who is rich?  The hard working people who lived in a duplex, house hacked, improved cities, sacrificed.

So the whole 3000 year old property ownership from the days of ancient rome are out the door.  It's like You work your *** off to buy a home then the property rights are taken away.

Why?Because, "hey we are millennials and we deserve housing. We deserve free this free that!  Who will pay for it? hmm I duno the rich??"

http://cesinaction.org.dnnmax.com/IssuesActivities...

TImage result for rent control seattle protestImage result for rent control seattle protestImage result for rent control seattle protest



Originally posted by @Michele Fischer:

Document, document, document.  Have a a reason that isn't discriminatory.  In this case I would say that my policy is that the newer tenant has not been there long enough to raise rent. Periodically calculate market rent compared to other units for rent, document why one side is better than the other, set policies.  We don't raise rent the first year, other years we raise rent to be the midpoint between current and market rent, or we don't raise on anyone.  We document our analysis every year.

I agree Michele.  YOu need to document and make a paper trail. 

Careful these groups are trying to spread more rent regulations and controls throughout the nation. They're heavily lobbying

http://cesinaction.org.dnnmax.com/IssuesActivities...

Seattle rent control really illegal

http://kuow.org/post/rent-control-illegal-seattle-...

Post: RENT CONTROL - BOUNDARIES

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

Proposed legislation is a looooooong way away from law. I wouldn't fret about this bill until it gets out of the Senate. Realtors and Apartment Associations have very strong lobbies. I have worked with both during my time in the Legislature. 

Well we have to counter it.  It's in every major new paper they have the momentum. There's a lot of little groups funded by Tenants Together and some larger groups that want to create new beauracracies.  They don't care about cities or communities.  They want more votes and a band aid to the real housing problem:

http://tenantstogether.org/campaigns

http://www.tenantstogether.org/rent-control-toolki...

http://www.forworkingfamilies.org/about/affiliates...

http://www.housinglb.org/newsmedia/

https://www.bisnow.com/san-francisco/news/affordab...

http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/02/29/alameda-gro...

So get active now.  Join local investor and landlord groups, local apartment associations.

https://caanet.org/

CAA etc

Originally posted by @Steven Hamilton II:

@Buddy Holmes,  

It takes far more than just the 750 hours.

What do you mean Steven could you elaborate?

Thanks Alvin.  I will be needing as many writeoffs as possible.

So if I have a net loss on properties even if it's say $20,000 net loss (depreciation, prop taxes etc) that can be written off any income?  W2, 401k etc??

Post: Long Beach Investor Roll Call

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by @Kris McGee:

Hi Susan-

Don't even get me started on rent control. LOL. The push is nothing new. 

It's happening

Look at this video

http://www.housinglb.org/newsmedia/

http://www.bhclongbeach.org/lbrising/

These heavily funded groups from outside the city with national funding.  They want to create new bureaucracies in long beach city hall and expand rent control through Long Beach, South Bay - Los Angeles and into Orange County as well.

Post: Rent Control Strategies

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by @Matt Mason:
Originally posted by @Susan O.:

Again.  Nothing in there about cash for keys becoming illegal. 

Well it looks like it's getting an overhaul statewide unless we do something about it.  Here's a large tenant group that is funding smaller groups throughout the state

http://www.tenantstogether.org/issue/rent-control

http://www.tenantstogether.org/campaigns/rent-cont...

Originally posted by @Shirley L.:

If the AB1506 passed, It will be nightmare for landlords and future renter .  The Bill is distructive for the communities under RC areas and hinder the future developer to build more apartments and houses in that regions.  It is the scams from Policaticians and the current professional tenants who can rip off the landlords' investments with their attorney.

http://www.tenantstogether.org/updates/ab-1506-int...

TenantsTogether is a statewide group that is funding a bunch of local groups trying to make the AB 1506 Rent Control

Post: Priced Out: Is Rent Control Coming to Sacramento?

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by @Wes Blackwell:

After a long day of looking at some potential properties with some clients of mine, we decided to stop in at Selland's Market Cafe and grab some lunch. While waiting for my mouth-watering french dip to arrive, I decided to pick up this week's edition of Sacramento News & Review and see if there was anything new going on in the real estate market. 

And oh boy was there...

Priced Out: Rent Control Becomes Focus of Sacramento Town Hall on Housing

"Popular rent stabilization initiatives in Richmond and Mountain View face legal challenge, force other jurisdictions to consider idea."

As you've probably already heard, San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose have become some of the costliest markets in the nation to live in. And more and more people are looking to Sacramento as a much more affordable alternative. In fact, the percentage of people living in the Bay Area and searching for Sacramento homes on Redfin has nearly doubled since 2011!

I've also written more in-depth about this migration trend here if you're interested:

https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/621/topics/396725-millennial-migration-to-sacramento-2017---here-comes-the-rush

Anyhoo, Sacramento City Councilman Steve Hansen recently held a town hall meeting to discuss the issue and over 100 people showed up to the event. Sacramento Housing Alliance Executive Director Darryl Rutherford cited statistics showing that 50% of families in Sacramento County meet the federal classification of "low income."

According to Rutherford, this statistic is reinforced by the fact that the county's lowest paid renters are now spending over 62% of their monthly income on rent! Yikes!

"When asked about his position on rent control, Hansen stated it "...would be really popular in the central city, but it might cause a lot of important building and economic activity to just move to other parts of the city where developers didn’t have to deal with it.”

"That prediction didn’t go over well with downtown resident Jonah Paul, one of the speakers who addressed the town hall. Paul has been hearing more and more of his friends talk about the need for a Sacramento ballot initiative aimed at blocking excessive greed from unraveling the fabric of their community."

“Rent stabilization just means that the increases are reasonable, so landlords can still make a profit, but tenants aren’t getting gouged,” Paul told SN&R after the town hall. “There is a complicated dynamic in Sacramento between escalating prices and tenants feeling vulnerable. … What I heard at the town hall was a lot about the problems with NIMBY-ism, but it’s a little more complicated than that. We’re in a serious quagmire here.”

MY THOUGHTS ON SACRAMENTO RENT CONTROL

Rent control is currently a whisper, but with the slated increases of rents projected for 10% this year and 8.5% next year, the conversation will certainly grow much louder in the years to come.

Naturally, there are strong opinions on both sides of the fence. Renters are strongly for it (of course), and landlords are strongly against it (again, of course).

But the thing that separates Sacramento from the Bay Area is that you can move just 10-15 minutes outside the city center and pay DRAMATICALLY less in rent. 

So if you don't want to pay high rents, don't live in downtown-midtown. 'Nuff said.

I used to rent a 1 bedroom apartment in Arden inside of a gated complex with low crime, a nice pool & spa, and an on-site gym for only $700 per month. Every time one of my friends said they were looking for a place I'd recommend it to them, and you know what they said?

"Nah... I want to live closer to midtown. I want to be where all the action is!"

Well then, you're going to pay for it. Duh. So don't complain about it.

CURRENT MARKET RENTS AND RENTING VS. BUYING

This isn't like San Francisco where you're forced to pay $3,000+ for a 1 bedroom in the hot part of town... you can find a 1 bedroom apartment in Midtown for less than $1,200. And if you look hard enough you can find them for less than $900 per month. 

Still too much? Then move to North Sac and pay only $700 per month. There are PLENTY of affordable options for housing in Sacramento, so what's all the fussing for?

But what if a 1 bedroom place is too small, but the $1,600+ 2 bedroom apartment is too much for you? Hmmm... well then why don't you BUY A HOUSE! What a novel idea!

There are currently 253 two+ bedroom houses for sale in Sacramento for less than $235,000. With only 5% down your mortgage payment would be less than $1,600 and you wouldn't have to worry about your monthly payment going up 18.5% over the next two years.

But what's stopping those people from buying a house?

We just invited some friends over to show them that instead of renting a 2 bedroom house in Land Park for $1,800 they could own a 3/2 on a quarter acre with a pool in a low-crime neighborhood with great school districts like we do. But... 

The husband doesn't want to move too far away from downtown. Why? Well frankly, he's an idiot. But it just goes to show you that many people are doing it to themselves.

So in sum, rent control is probably not going to happen anytime soon, but the conversation is already up for discussion, and will certainly grow right along with the rents. 

But as long as your rental is outside of the city's core (which I'd recommend because prices are super inflated there anyways) you probably won't ever have to worry about it.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

I'd love to hear some other opinions on the topic, both from landlords and renters, and other real estate professionals too. Is there something I missed? Do you think rent control would be good for the economy? Or worse? Have anything to add?

Here's some info to share with your local politicians and State assembly:

Contacting Califronia state assemblyman:

http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/

You should also look up your local city council members and contact them.

Almost every Urban Planning and economist organization agrees that rent controls hurt local governments/cities:

This is really an issue with the city. The city should have planned better and created more affordable housing. They have really harsh code enforcement and building inspectors which make it difficult to build. They disincentize investors and landlords to fix up their buildings by putting in rent controls.. If there was no rent control rents would be about 10-15% cheaper because there wouldn't be such a need to raise and price gouge new vacancies.

It also makes cities lose on property taxes which are increased mainly when properties SELL. Rent control hinders sales of properties.

Most economists agree that rent controls mess up big cities and MAKE LESS AFFORDABLE HOUSING in the long run

Almost 95% of economist say it's bad for local communities in the long run. It's a short term bandaid that usually helps middle-upper class long term tenants, not the truly poor/needy. Eventually the cheapest units get taken off market to be used as storage, new development ie tear downs etc.

Here are some articles on Urban development, economists that are bi-partisan. This issue is like global warming. All the experts are in agreement!:

Recent Beacon study on economics. From Urban Institute, to Business Insider Mag, to The Economist all have same result. IN FACT 95% of economists:

This is one by "The Economist" which is a popular economy magazine:

A housing/planning and urban development website:

Foundation for Economic Education:

Business Insider:

CEI: