General Landlording & Rental Properties
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply
![Ana Marie B.'s profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/365844/1694836526-avatar-anamarie.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/cover=128x128&v=2)
Interesting Anti-Landlord Ordinance Approved in Seattle
Curious what others think of this new pro-renter ordinance approved in Seattle. Would this make you think twice before investing in Seattle RE?
In a nutshell, this ordinance aims to ban "discrimination by landlords against renters with alternative sources of income, such as Social Security benefits, veteran’s benefits, unemployment insurance, child-support payments and other assistance programs. The ordinance also will require landlords to review applications one at a time, then pick the first renter who meets their screening criteria."
Here's the link:
Most Popular Reply
![Jennifer T.'s profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/239692/1694579629-avatar-sassynola.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/cover=128x128&v=2)
I don't have properties in that area. But, IMO, the only two issues I have with the ordinance are 1) not being able to select the best tenant and 2) unemployment as a form of income.
Unemployment as a form of income is RIDICULOUS. In most areas UE is 6 months, at the longest. And that is 6 months if they are applying for an apartment right at the beginning of their UE. What if there is only 1 month left anyway? Come on.
Do you know who also has to follow anti-discrimination laws? Companies, for hiring and promotions. Is there also a law in Seattle that companies need to hire the FIRST candidate with all of their requirements, instead of looking for the best qualified candidate? I'm guessing the answer is a giant no. So why would that same idea be different for LLs? It shouldn't. Also completely ridiculous.