Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

206
Posts
156
Votes
Ana Marie B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • SF Bay Area, CA
156
Votes |
206
Posts

Interesting Anti-Landlord Ordinance Approved in Seattle

Ana Marie B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • SF Bay Area, CA
Posted

Curious what others think of this new pro-renter ordinance approved in Seattle.  Would this make you think twice before investing in Seattle RE?

In a nutshell, this ordinance aims to ban "discrimination by landlords against renters with alternative sources of income, such as Social Security benefits, veteran’s benefits, unemployment insurance, child-support payments and other assistance programs. The ordinance also will require landlords to review applications one at a time, then pick the first renter who meets their screening criteria."

Here's the link:

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/...

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,096
Posts
943
Votes
Jennifer T.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
943
Votes |
1,096
Posts
Jennifer T.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
Replied

I don't have properties in that area.  But, IMO, the only two issues I have with the ordinance are 1) not being able to select the best tenant and 2) unemployment as a form of income.

Unemployment as a form of income is RIDICULOUS.  In most areas UE is 6 months, at the longest.  And that is 6 months if they are applying for an apartment right at the beginning of their UE.  What if there is only 1 month left anyway?  Come on. 

Do you know who also has to follow anti-discrimination laws?  Companies, for hiring and promotions.  Is there also a law in Seattle that companies need to hire the FIRST candidate with all of their requirements, instead of looking for the best qualified candidate?  I'm guessing the answer is a giant no.  So why would that same idea be different for LLs?  It shouldn't.  Also completely ridiculous.

  • Jennifer T.
  • Loading replies...