Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mike Hartzog

Mike Hartzog has started 20 posts and replied 545 times.

Post: What city would you buy in today (August 2014)

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490

One thing to look at is population growth.  You can find future projections online, but recent history is a strong indicator as well.  Here are the top 50 cities for population growth from 2010-2013 from the US census.  The right hand column is percentage growth over that timeframe.

1Cedar Park city, Texas18.4
2South Jordan city, Utah17.7
3Frisco city, Texas16.8
4McKinney city, Texas13.4
5Irvine city, California11.7
6Goodyear city, Arizona11.7
7Cary town, North Carolina11.7
8Midland city, Texas11.5
9Buckeye town, Arizona11.4
10Pearland city, Texas11.3
11Meridian city, Idaho11.3
12Odessa city, Texas10.9
13Pasco city, Washington10.7
14Mount Pleasant town, South Carolina10.4
15Gilbert town, Arizona10.3
16New Orleans city, Louisiana10.1
17Franklin city, Tennessee10.0
18Conroe city, Texas9.9
19Round Rock city, Texas9.8
20Auburn city, Alabama9.7
21Gaithersburg city, Maryland9.7
22Fort Myers city, Florida9.6
23New Braunfels city, Texas9.6
24Bismarck city, North Dakota9.4
25Kissimmee city, Florida9.4
26Austin city, Texas9.2
27Allen city, Texas9.2
28Fishers town, Indiana9.0
29League City city, Texas8.9
30Lake Elsinore city, California8.8
31Carmel city, Indiana8.5
32Noblesville city, Indiana8.4
33Edinburg city, Texas8.4
34Alpharetta city, Georgia8.3
35Conway city, Arkansas8.3
36Denver city, Colorado8.2
37West Des Moines city, Iowa8.0
38Mansfield city, Texas8.0
39Johns Creek city, Georgia7.9
40Denton city, Texas7.8
41Casper city, Wyoming7.8
42Charlotte city, North Carolina7.8
43Fargo city, North Dakota7.7
44Menifee city, California7.6
45Bossier City city, Louisiana7.6
46Durham city, North Carolina7.5
47Cape Coral city, Florida7.5
48Washington city, District of Columbia7.4
49Rogers city, Arkansas7.4
50Manhattan city, Kansas7.4

Post: Anyone ever purchase a HOA foreclosure deed?

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490
Originally posted by @Matt R.:
Originally posted by @Mike Hartzog:

Matt - If the 1st lien holder gets their lien re-attached to the deed in a legal action, they would have no motivation to short sell because their lien would be at 97K against a property value of 132K. They would simply foreclose since they would have 35K equity in the property.

 Another great condideration Mike. I will have to look into that. I am not sure if the 1st lenders position is unattached at any point but that would become a deal breaker if that happens. Does it make sense that these would behave like a mechanics lien where as it is considered work rendered and junior but must be handled? Thanks, Matt

Matt - We seem to have a disconnect here. Your original post said you had the opportunity to purchase an HOA deed at 25c on the dollar. A deed conveys ownership so my assumption was that the HOA foreclosure had already happened and your opportunity was to take ownership of the property. I am thinking now that you meant HOA lien. Is that correct?

Post: Anyone ever purchase a HOA foreclosure deed?

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490

Matt - If the 1st lien holder gets their lien re-attached to the deed in a legal action, they would have no motivation to short sell because their lien would be at 97K against a property value of 132K. They would simply foreclose since they would have 35K equity in the property.

Post: Anyone ever purchase a HOA foreclosure deed?

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490

Right. I simple title search should verify that the mortgage liens are gone. I think the real issue is one of notification, where if the first lien holder did not receive proper notification of foreclosure they could potentially win recourse of some kind in a lawsuit. The question I have is what is that recourse. My assumption is that the mortgage lien could be reinstated against the deed. Using Matt's numbers above, that would leave him with a loss on the investment. (38K investment + 97K lien = 135K, against FMV of 132K, and we haven't counted delinquent property taxes and selling costs yet.)

Post: Anyone ever purchase a HOA foreclosure deed?

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490

Rick - That is my understanding too, but I am not sure if the HOA gets to step in line ahead of delinquent property taxes. I assume not.

Post: Wholesale question- I am new and just want to make sure i fully understand....

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490

Never rely on a "Zestimate".  Better to contact a local agent for a valuation and take it from there.  Foreclosures are not always good deals as there are a lot of underwater properties out there.

Post: Anyone ever purchase a HOA foreclosure deed?

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490

I have been following this thread with interest.  Rick's comment makes sense to me.  So I guess the strategy here would be to rent the condo out while you are waiting for the bank to make a move.  I am unclear though what would happen if the bank took the deed holder (investor) to court and won.  I assume they get the right to re-attach their lien to the property.  Is that right?  If so, then one major thing to look at when evaluating the investment is the unpaid balance of the lien compared to the value of the condo.

Post: Outs on a Chap. 7 non-performing 2nd?

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490

@Bill McCafferty - I am focused on non-performing 1st liens.  I would be interested to hear more about how you like to work the 2nds.  Specifically, once you foreclose you have the property subject to the first.  Are you generally selling or keeping them for rentals while maintaining the first lien?

Post: who would I foreclose on?

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490
Originally posted by @Wayne Brooks:

Perhaps I'm dense, but does a DIL not satisfy the debt, the note. Wouldn't you then be foreclosing on a satisfied note, perhaps fraudulently?

@Dion DePaoli What say you?

Deed in Lieu will satisfy the debt if the bank agrees accept the deed as full consideration for the loan, and that is general practice, but it only applies to that specific loan.  It would not satisfy junior liens.  So for example, if I am holding a first note and you are holding a second note on the same property, and the borrower conveys title to me via DIL, the first lien is satisfied but now I hold deed subject to your note which is now in first position.   

Post: who would I foreclose on?

Mike Hartzog
Pro Member
Posted
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 490

@Stephen S. -  If the owners bankruptcy was chapter 7 they no longer have a personal obligation to repay the loan, and the bank has no recourse against the owner.  The owner could check with their BK attorney to verify this.   The loan is still a valid lien against the property however, and the bank can still foreclose.  Because the owner currently has nothing to gain by helping with a short sale, you might offer some cash for helping you complete one successfully.  And I think @Divina Westerfield is correct.  You need to get a title search ($75 online) to find out about any junior liens.  If there are junior liens of any significance which are not currently held by the bank which holds the first lien, its probably a no-go.  You will also likely need the help of a good RE agent to get the short sale submitted to the bank.  Its a long shot at best IMO.