Originally posted by @Dan H.:
Originally posted by @Supada L.:
Originally posted by @Scot Howat:
Most people dump a few hundred dollars a month into a savings account without thinking twice. If you're losing a few hundred dollars a month I don't think that's a big deal. Think of that property as a savings account. Except that the mortgage balance is getting paid down ($), you get great tax write offs ($$), and if you bought a decent property then the rent will increase ($$$) and the value will go up over time ($$$$).
If it was me, I'd keep it and move on to the next deal. You can always reposition it later (refinance, re-rent etc....).
I bought a deal that was a negative cash flow from day 1 because of my financing (13% interest rate), and I knew it was under valued but that the market hadn't caught up to it yet. I purchased it for 90k and based on the current available comps the appraiser also said it was worth 90k. But I knew it was worth at least 120k, but there were no comps to support it. So I bought it anyways and lost about $300/m. I have a great tenant pool in that area FYI (very important). 15 months later it appraised for 125k and I refinanced into a small positive cashflow but a huge equity position.
Not all negative cash flow deals are bad.
Thank you so much for sharing your story. It's very encouraging. I've decided to hold it for another year and reevaluate the situation. Thank you. =)
>I've decided to hold it for another year and reevaluate the situation.
You have indicated the pro forma is too aggressive. I showed, with cited references, that the historical rent and property appreciation is below the rate of inflation. Another poster pointed out the city has a declining population. I did not verify this information, but it seems likely seeing, in inflation adjusted dollars, the property value and rent has been declining.
What do you expect to happen in the next year? I suspect a best case, but unlikely because it has an aggressive pro forma, is that you get $1200 cash flow over the next 12 months. The more likely scenario is that you continue to have negative cash flow.
The negative cash flow would not bother me if there was good evidence that it would improve. Without rent or property appreciation (meaning the appreciation is less than the rate of inflation) I see little chance of the situation improving.
Some questions/thoughts:
- What are you expecting to happen in the next 12 months? What do you see occurring to make this a decent investment?
2. Do you believe you cannot find a better investment? The S&P 500 has a lifetime return over 9%. It is passive. I am not saying S&P should be the best investment you can find, but I do believe over the long term it will do better than your Meridian investment. - 3. I realize there is selling costs. You never indicated how much you invested (your initial out of pocket purchase costs), but I expect it was at least 20% (I.e. no greater than 80% LTV). If you sell at a cost of 8% (commissions plus any other closing/miscellaneous costs), you will recover much of that initial investment.
4. There are too many good investment opportunities available to keep such a poor investment. Even if it produced $100/month cash flow, this would be a poor investment due to the poor cash flow combined with the poor appreciation outlook.
5. I see virtually no up side in keeping this investment. Best case, it meets its projected cash flow and has a poor return. Worse case, and the more likely case, it continues to have negative cash flow.
Good luck
Thank you for your questions/thoughts. I'm not sure why the rent rate on Rent Jungle and Zillow do not match. This rental is 3BD/1BH. I'm renting out at $850. Zillow estimates $1000. I agree that the appreciation is not good. =(